Friday, February 17, 2012

How Some Pro-Aborts Tip Their Hands Without Really Trying

If you go to the American Life League video on their Planned Parenthood expose, you'll see that it is "no longer available due to a copywright claim by Jessica Faerman".

So who might she be?  The internet can tell us a lot - especially since that name isn't all that common.  A google of that name brings up some very interesting sites.

First, we see that a Jessica Faerman is an alternate delegate to the Texas Democratic convention.   We can also see that she is quite concerned about The High Price of Campus Birth Control.   See how she whines about spending $40.00 a month to be cushioned from the consequences of her, uh, "extracurricular activities".  I wonder if that pressing concern has been rectified now (see the bottom paragraph)?

She did at one time work with the campus health department (University of Texas at Austin) as a member of a pro-abortion recruitment bunch calling themselves "Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom" (see page 8).  She and other volunteers encouraged other students to be "Sex Ed Superstars".

So she's looking to make "sex ed superstars" - who will also be seeking out birth control and abortion.  No wonder she resents ALL's video.  She has no standing to bring charges of "copywright violation" unless her works were plagerized.  At law, one can sue if and only if they are a legitimately aggrieved party of a particular wrong - a pro-abortion bias is not legitimate grounds, Jessica!

28 comments:

  1. You need to recheck you idea of copyright laws. They are pretty specific and not as generalized as you make them out to be nor prone to what you're calling "pro-abortion bias."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Check your facts, yo!
    -Jessica Faerman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's a point in copyright law called "Fair Use", Jess.
      You may read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
      You can read, can't you?

      Pertinent except: "In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship."

      Note specifically "commentary, criticism, news reporting". To all but a complete moron, it is clear that in this instance "Fair Use" applies, and there is no copyright violation!

      Check the LAW, dimwit!

      Delete
  3. We hope you don't mind, we made a link to your video on our PP protest page:

    http://www.voting4life.org/Pages/008_Planned_Parenthood.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. What happened to loving babies still in the womb? One of them
      may have become a neighbor had they been allowed to live. If
      you truly "love thy neighbor", then you should love that your
      neighbor may have been born simply because the mother didn't
      believe in abortion. Your argument is absurd when you think of it.

      Delete
    2. I just wanted to know ... why you decided to take it down. This was the best anti PP film and anti Abortion piece out there today. It did wonders in just the short time it was up. It introduced everyone who saw it to the filth your side promotes.

      Love thy Neighbor???? What love did you show to all the innocents that were damaged by your "educational filth". You have taken something that is so beautiful and drug it through a sewer of cultural excrement that has yet to be surpassed in modern day. You should be ashamed of yourself.

      Love you? No, I pity you.

      Delete
    3. emc, I suppose you're addressing your question to Jess (about taking it down)? Well, it did pose a threat to PP's business and cash inflows.

      We do owe her charity. Of course the first Spiritual Work of Mercy is to "rebuke the sinner". As far as the clip itself, I have it on good information that the last chapter on that is yet to be written. The truth cannot be suppressed.

      Delete
    4. You have the nerve to talk about love your neighbor while you promote killing pre-born children and unrestricted sex? As an ex-intern of Planned Parenthood, how proud your loved ones must be of your self-shot picture you posted licking a penis lollipop.

      Delete
  5. Apparently you've never studied Copyright Law, but next time someone wants to make a Pro-Choice ad I'll make sure they use your picture without your permission.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "unless her works were plagerized"
    ...
    her works were plagerized.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous of 1:04, the video was produced by American Life League. I merely posted to it. However, as you will notice on your site, Ms Faerling had it censored.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anon of 11:26 last evening, what are these "pretty specific copyright laws" to which you allude? Why didn't you just state them outright - if they exist?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jessica, it looks like your knickers are in a royal knot! It's understandable, as I'm sure the truth is a difficult pill to swallow for someone who's committed to the pervasive lies of the abortion mentality. First you tell me to "check my facts". Well, what are YOUR facts? Do they exist? I highly doubt that; otherwise you would have been brandishing them proudly.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anon of 1:16pm, which of her works was/were plagerized? Examples? By the way - plagerism happens when the guilty party takes the works of another and tries to pass them off as his/her own. Let me put your little mind at ease! I feel quite confident in assuring you that the American Life League has no interest whatsoever in claiming to be the originators of "penis lollipops", "vagina costumes" and the other pieces of pig-slop that are the typical trademarks of "sex-ed superstars"!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Maybe Jessica Faerman was the one in the giant penis costume?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jessica was the one who posted herself licking the penis lollipop.

      Delete
    2. Untwisted, I saw something to that effect on Jill Stanek's blog. See http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/02/planned-parenthoods-graphic-photo-that-got-alls-expose-yanked-from-youtube/#more-61937

      Delete
  12. Jess
    Ah, Love thy neighbor a very good thing.
    And if I truly love you, I want what is best for you. The very best thing I can desire for you is eternity in heaven with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. If I hate you, I say, continue on the path you are going and spend eternity in hell. My God knew you and called you by name before you were even born. He has a plan for your life. He loves you so much He wants you to spend eternity in heaven with Him, but the choice is yours.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Please keep us updated and try to get that video back up as soon as possible. It is the most effective one American Life League made to date, that is the reason the pro-aborts are attacking it so aggressively. When average people learn what these pedophiles are showing our kids, it will be WW3.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Congratulations, you found the Achilles heel of Planned Parenthood, don't give up on this one. You should seriously consider going to Fox News, you hit big. They are the number one watched News Station, and they would love a story like this. Make this video into a home run!

    ReplyDelete
  15. SaveOurChurch, the video is the work of Michael Hichborn and the American Life League. You might want to post your suggestion on their web page (they're at the very top of the website list on the right side-bar).

    ReplyDelete
  16. Jessica Faerman needs to transfer to New College in Sarasota, FL where students have naked pot luck dinners, naked beach days, and where they go stark naked on parents' weekend in the courtyard painting each other. She could then write a book and name it Penis Rising which could further the agenda of sex and death by abortion that she has so cluelessly, in her naivete, bought into.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Youtube moved this video to the 18 or older category because of sexual content. Amazing, material that Planed Parenthood is showing 10 year olds is judged inappropriate for people under 18 by Youtube!

    http://www.Youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DuWHsFE4TNGs

    ReplyDelete
  18. That video was censored as well by another liberal, Timothy Schapker

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know who that individual is. At any rate, the ALL video is back up and out of their reaches.

      Delete

Please be respectful and courteous to others on this blog. We reserve the right to delete comments that violate courtesy and/or those that promote dissent from the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church.