After the Fatima apparitions, the children said that Our Lady confided three secrets to them and that they were to be announced no later than 1960. Moreover, the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart was supposed to be done by the pope as soon as possible but no later than 1960. To date, neither has happened. Ironically, Francis is the one who has come closest to fulfilling the consecration request in that he explicitly mention Russia by name, but he did not order the bishops to join him in the consecration (a number of them did, though, on their own initiative).
In the middle of the 20th century, Sister Lucia stated several times that Our Lady was displeased at the delay in fulfilling her requests. Then, in the 1980s, after John Paul II consecrated the world - not mentioning Russia by name - to her Immaculate Heart, Sister Lucia was quoted as saying that this consecration fulfilled Our Lady's request. That is, of course, a flat-out lie. Our Lady was quite specific when she said that Russia must be consecrated. She singled out Russia, and the consecration should have done the same. I had always hypothesized that Sister Lucia was being misquoted by bad-actor bishops and that may indeed be the case. Now that some are coming forth with evidence that the Lucy that we've been seeing for the past few decades may be an imposter, we can reasonably entertain the possibility that this bogus Lucy did claim that John Paul's consecration was according to Our Lady's stipulations.
Think of it. This woman, if she was an imposter, was lying anyway. Why would she have any compunctions regarding her false claim? For that matter, her claim regarding the third secret is probably also a lie and we still aren't being told the full story, contrary to Our Lady's wishes. I post three videos below and ask that you watch these closely. I will have more commentary below them.
In the Lifesite clip, Dr Chojnowski mentioned (the real) Sister Lucy's insistence that the third secret be announced no later than 1960 or the time of her death. However, in a 1993 interview, the imposter said that the secret was not to be released. This is at the 29:03 mark of the video.
Not only do we have a clear contradiction, but perhaps we have here a motive for replacing Sister Lucy with an imposter. During much of the 1950s, Pius XII was pope. Aside from his own faulty consecration (he mentioned Russia but did not involve the bishops) he seemed ready to obey the Fatima message, meaning that he would have released the third secret in compliance with those deadlines. I am now hypothesizing, but perhaps the real Sister Lucy passed away in the 1950s. To prevent the pope from revealing the Third Secret, is it possible that the masons in the Vatican coughed up a scheme to present a phony Lucy so Pius would not believe it incumbent to reveal the Third Secret?
Perhaps several popes were deceived by her. She was cloistered and not seen frequently. Pope John XXIII still could not have been held blameless as 1960 happened during his pontificate. Again, this is just a theory, but it sounds more humane than if the masons actually harmed the real Sister Lucy.
At any rate, it seems to be the case that what we have here is a brazen attempt to thwart the intentions of the Mother of God, and of Our Lord Himself. If nothing else, it shows that the masons believe in the spiritual ramifications of the Fatima message; why else would they work so feverishly to thwart it? And no, it wasn't just mere fear of insulting the Soviet Union. They knew what they were doing - engaging in yet another attempt to undermine Holy Mother Church.
So how have they gotten by with this scam for so long? There are a multiple of factors.
- Catholics today, even well-meaning Catholics, are simply ignorant of both Church teaching and Church history. In this day and age, with the internet at our disposal, such ignorance is inexcusable. I would recommend some serious reading and study. For details about Fatima, read accounts dated 1950-ish or older. Compare that with what the imposter said.
- Well-meaning Catholics are way too naïve regarding clergy and other leaders. One would think that the sex scandals might have knocked off some rose-colored glasses but for too many, that has not been the case. There is evil in the Church, even in the Vatican itself. Wake up
And if there was an imposter Sr. Lucy for decades, then that much-quited statement of hers from the 1980s that the final battle between Our Lord and the Devil would be over marriage and the family is false.
ReplyDeleteIt very well could be.
Delete