Please read the title closely. I believe that evil now controls the hierarchy of the Church, not the Church herself. There is a difference. However, that evil can and is causing much scandal and confusion that is literally causing damnation of souls. Therefore, we must continue to shine the light on it, no matter where it resides. Of course evil will hate to be exposed; it always has. We must not shirk from that task now, out of misguided deference to the Church structures behind which the evil conceals itself.
Remnant TV hosted the Catholic Identity Conference this week. Below I'm posting a talk from it by Edward Pentin. He talks of the climate of fear that now exists in the Vatican - one that is very reminiscent of the climate that existed in the Soviet Union and that still exists in other repressive regimes. Below that I'll have more commentary and an important action to take.
As I mentioned in the earlier post, the USCCB is obviously taking instructions from the Vatican (a novelty for them, for they certainly didn't do so during the previous two pontificates) as evidenced by their dismissal of Father Weinandy. The faithful laity, by the grace of God, are calling them on the carpet. See here and here. LifeSiteNews started a petition drive, not so much as to persuade the USCCB to change their ways but to show public support for Father Weinandy. Please sign it. Besides prayer, we can influence the USCCB by withholding donations from any second-collection effort for them or their subsidiaries: most notably the Catholic Campaign for Human Development and Catholic Relief Services.
Saturday, November 4, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why do these shepherds refuse to publish the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth re: Catholic Relief Services? And the Campaign For Human Development? the words "so called" are appropriate preceding the names of each of these agencies, and before the word shepherds.
ReplyDeleteFor the story of how Alinsky used the Chicago Catholic Church, Egan, Bernardin, et al, and the Catholic Bishops Campaign for Human Development as his "tontos utiles," check out- availabale on line:
THE INFLUENCE OF SAUL ALINSKY ON THE CAMPAIGN FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. by LAWRENCE J. ENGEL
Publication Information: Article Title: The Influence of Saul Alinsky on the Campaign for Human Development. Contributors: Lawrence J. Engel - author. Journal Title: Theological Studies. Volume: 59. Issue: 4. Publication Year: 1998
Guy McClung, Texas
Thank you so much for posting Edward Pentin, who speaks softly on the hard realities as only the British can do. Will forward to my (adult) children who appreciate him and his wit. He provides much to think about and discuss.
ReplyDeleteYes, thank you for this....watched it yesterday in its entirety as someone posted it on Twitter. Edward Pentin is the BEST! He gave a pretty thorough run down of the anti Catholic initiatives being put in place in the Vatican and even initiated by Bergoglio himself. Mr. Pentin is the real deal, and always gets the inside scoop of what's happening in Rome.
ReplyDeleteEdward Pentin who also attended a similar conference in Italy where Chris Ferrara was present is not aware fo the following:
ReplyDeleteNOVEMBER 8, 2017
Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
The Great Façade: The Regime of Novelty in the Catholic Church from Vatican II to the Francis Revolu
Also Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei it is hoped will announce that when they wrote their books on Vatican Council II, they were unaware that Vatican Council II and EENS could be interpreted without the irrational premise.
Image result for Photo books of Archbishop Marcel LefebvreImage result for Photo books of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Their books are now obsolete as are the writings of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.-
Vatican needs to apologise for the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre 1.
-Lionel Andrades
1
Vatican needs to apologise for the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/vatican-cdfecclesia-dei-needs-to.html
NOVEMBER 8, 2017
Vatican knows that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus can be affirmed and interpreted with the rigorist interpretation even after Vatican Council II: but does not recognise this interpretation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/vatican-knows-that-dogma-extra.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/books-of-archbishop-lefebvre-are.html
NOVEMBER 10, 2017
ReplyDeleteNo clarification or response from Bishop Robert J.McManus or Brother Thomas Augustine MICM on Catholic doctrine : how did they interpret Vatican Council II and EENS?
The Slaves of the Immaculate have been recognized by the Catholic Church as a religious community with canonical status who follow the magisterium and can teach Catholic doctrine.But there is still no clarification on doctrine and theology from Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, Superior, St.Benedict Center, Still River, Massachusetts or the Chancellery Office at the Diocese of Worcester or Bishop Robert J. McManus, the bishop of Worcester.Posts on this blog have been e-mailed to them.
TEN QUESTIONS
Here are 10 questions I ask them to please clarify for Catholics.What is the doctrinal teaching of the Catholic Church and what has been accepted by the MICM community ? Can one interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation?
For me the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith/Holy Office 1949 in the Letter of the Holy Office made a mistake. The Letter assumedinvisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism, of blood(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible and known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS,these being examples of salvation outside the Church.I mentioned this in a previous blog post.1
So for me Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office was irrational in its philosophy and new theology.Fr. Leonard Feeney was orthodox and the Holy Office was in heresy, with its visible examples of salvation of invisible people.
1) So my question is do the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center,Still River and Bishop Robert J.McManus interpret invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to visible exceptions to EENS? Unknownpeople are known exceptions to EENS?
2) Do they acknowledge that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to unknown people in 2017? We cannot meet or see someone saved as such in 2017, would they agree ?
_____________________________
In the same blog post I mentioned that Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger were wrong to excommunicate Archbishop Lefebvre.The central issue was Vatican Council II. He was correct. Vatican Council II,with LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc mistaken as known people saved outside the Church, has to be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.With an irrational premise there is a non traditional conclusion. Archbishop Lefebvre rejected this interpretation of the Council which was accepted by the CDF Prefect and the pope.
3.For canonical status did Brother Thomas Augustine MICM have to interpret Lumen Gentium 16 etc as referring to known and visible people saved outside the Church?
4.For canonical status can the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) in general, interpret Lumen Gentium 16 etc as referring to hypothetical cases, known only to God.So being invisible and unknown in our reality, they cannot be exceptions to EENS, as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century?
5.Are the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary able to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS? This would be EENS as the missionaries intepreted in the 16th century.
6.Can they interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, assuming hypothetical cases (BOD, BOB and I.I/ LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2 etc) are simply hypothetical.They are not concrete and personally known people in our reality?
Continued
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-clarification-or-response-from.html
Edwin Pentin and traditionalists ignore this issue.
ReplyDeleteNOVEMBER 11, 2017
SSPX continues to calumniate Fr. Leonard Feeney : doctrinal ignorance prevents them from using Catholic churches on Sunday.
Return to product informationNo one in the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) knew of any one saved outside the Catholic Church this year or the last 100 years and they are still selling the book Is Feeneyism Catholic? by Fr.Francois Laisney .Reports on the Internet state books by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete and so also books on the Vatican Council II by Lefebrists Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei.There is no denial.It has been also shown that Bishop Fellay made a theological and doctrinal error in one of his Letters to Friend and Benefactors and there is no acknowledgement or clarification.They have nothing to say.
Image result for Photo Bishop Charles Morerod OpImage result for Photo Bishop Charles Morerod Op
A few years back Bishop Charles Morerod O.P stated that the SSPX should not be allowed to use Catholic Churches until the doctrinal issue is settled.There was no defense from the SSPX theologians in manifest ignorance.
The SSPX should by now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion is traditional.This is a discovery for the SSPX seminarians and priests today.
Capitularies of the SSPX's 2012 General Chapter
But they will continue to sell the book 'Is Feeneyism Catholic' by Fr. Francois Laisney, a priest of the SSPX who was asked by Bishop Fellay to write against Bishop Richard Williamson and he obeyed.The conclusion of Laisney's book is opposite to that of the 2012 SSPX General Chapter Doctrinal Statement which the Vatican liberals at the CDF/Ecclesia Dei rejected.
The traditionalist website Rorate Caeili cannot discuss this issue since the editor, 'New Catholic' is being threathened by the Jewish Left. Even the liberal rabbi who teaches Catholic seminarians ecumenism at the Pontifical University of St.Thomas Acquinas( Angelicum) Rome, objects. He would like Rorate Caeili and the SSPX to continue to interpret outside the Church there is no salvation, with the invisible people are visible premise ;unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is important for the emerging new one world religion in a new one world order, which the two popes are supporting.
Fr.Jean Marie Glieze who teaches Ecclesiology at the SSPX seminary Econe, Switzerland, led the SSPX side in the doctrinal talks with the Vatican not knowing that the baptism of desire was never an exception to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.This was the ruse of the liberal theologians.Archbishop Lefebvre was in ignorance and accepted it.Since Pius XII did not correct the error.
Image result for Photo Fr.Jean Marie Gleize SSPX
So at the Vatican talks, doctrinally Fr. Jean Marie Gleize was on the Dominican Fr.Charles Morerod's side.Morerod led the Vatican team and was later rewarded. When he was made a bishop in Switzerldand he announced that the SSPX should not be allowed to use Catholic churches unless they settle the doctrinal issue. He meant that they had to accept Vatican Council II with LG 16 referring to known people saved outside the Church.
Bishop Fellay is still clueless.
Also the lay supporters of the SSPX, writers and speakers, are keeping quiet on this issue. They cannot announce that they were wrong all these years on Catholic doctrine.
Possibily next month Rorate Caeili will post a report criticizing Vatican Council II but will not state that the Council is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.Expect the same from Remnant News, Angelus Press etc.
CONTINUED
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/sspx-continues-to-calumniate-fr-leonard.html