Environmentalism Is Anti-Life

This blog (and others) features several key posts exposing the anti-life underpinnings of the environmentalist poison infecting much of modern thought these days.  Now we have the Sierra Club to thank for the latest pieces of evidence.

Last week they sponsored a rally in Washington to protest the Keystone Pipeline.  Human Life International and Americans for Limited Government have interviewed protesters who have called for population control.  One man voiced support for the implementation of China's "one-child" policy here.  That's nothing new for the pro-abortion crowd.  In 1989, Molly Yard, then president of NOW, called China's brutal policy "among  the most intelligent in the world".  So much for "pro-choice", but I digress.

Another Sierra devotee coined (or parroted) the term "earth patriotism".  And what does that mean, you ask?  Well, it means not having "excessive children", that is, not more than two.  As you watch this video, try not to be too under-whelmed with the (dearth of) intellectual depth of the environmentalists.  After all, these are the folks who voted for the Messiah Most Miserable (evidence at 1:31 to the left of the screen).

Of Keystone And Contraception

Several days ago, Obama put the kibbosh on the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to Texas.  It would have brought a plentiful supply of oil and gas into the country while creating thousands of jobs in the process.  Alas, it ran afoul of global-warming-hoax believers and some environmental groups.  So he bowed to the envirowhackos and turned his back (once again) on the country at large.  He and Sebelius also are moving to compel people of conscience to pay for coverage for contraception and abortifacients (see previous post).

On the surface, these two issues appear to have nothing in common - unless you ponder the likely motives of the Messiah Most Miserable.  However, consider that: in both scenarios, he is completely disregarding the legitimate interests of the majority of American citizens to satisfy radical elements of his electoral base: the global-warming envirowhackos on one hand and radical abortion supporters on the other.  Also consider the timing.  Does anyone really think it's a coincidence that he's paying obeiscance to these radical components of his base at a time so close to the November elections?  Moreover, he is scheduled to deliver the State of the Union address tomorrow evening.

You may rest assured that tomorrow's address will be not much more than poltical grand-standing.  Dare I predict that he'll spend a goodly bit of time braying about the Keystone stoppage and the HHS draconian measures?  I predict that he'll be thumping his chest about both of these acts of supreme stupidity.

Besides that, I predict the address will sound a lot like the following video - unless the Messianic Teleprompter undergoes a significant tune-up!  (Click here if you can't see embedded video)