Some More Videos - And A Question Regarding One Of Them

Yesterday I stated that I would upload more videos that I took of yesterday's March for Marriage.  The first is a talk by a Protestant preacher - his name escapes me.  He explained to us the alphabetical structure of the Hebrew words for "man" and "woman".  I won't rehash the explanation here; please listen to it (I'll put all videos at the bottom of this post).  Suffice it to say that God hints that there will literally be hell to pay if two of the same sex try to join as man and woman were created to do.  Please keep this on the back burner as I comment on the third video of this post.

March For Marriage - Initial Report And Videos

I and many thousands attended the 2015 March For Marriage (spearheaded by National Organization for Marriage) this afternoon.  It was held on the Mall between the Washington Monument and the Capitol.  I took many shots but for now will feature only three of them.

It started with a rally which was well underway when we arrived.  You'll notice in the first video that I started recordin as we arrived that the Hispanics showed up in force.  I certainly commend them for that; I only regret that they put other Catholics to shame owing to their relative lack of appearance at the mall - particularly those Catholics in the local tri-state area.  To be honest, I know of only one parish in Maryland that gave the march the importance that it deserved.  Could it be that the presence of a same-sex "married" vice president of Catholic Relief Services may well have justified the lack of attention given to this important effort by many local Catholic pastors?

The second video shows the start of the march to the Supreme Court.  I'll have later shots of the march proper up in a day or so.  I commend the American Society for Tradition, Family and Property for lending their support to this effort.  These are the same men who have been leading the Marches for Life over these past many years.

Goodbye To Starbucks

Actually I cannot say that, but only because I never developed a taste for coffee.  That said, I'm suggesting that my coffee-drinking friends seriously consider eschewing Starbucks.  Its CEO Howard Schultz poo-pooed a suggestion by an investor that the conglomerate's support of sodomy is hurting the business.  While he acknowledged that their numbers weren't up to snuff, Schultz indicated that he didn't care; Starbucks would continue to support perversion.

I'll say this much for Schultz; he can't be accused of "double-speak".  BUT, if he doesn't care about receiving our money and our business, then we might as well take it elsewhere.  There's no need for us to waste our money there, as a portion of it will undoubtedly be used to undermine our core principles.  While I'm sure the coffee is decent, I also understand it's overpriced.  Get your coffee elsewhere and at a more reasonable price.  Then donate the difference to National Organization for Marriage.  As I said, I wish I could say I'm boycotting Starbucks but I never bought there anyway.

Alternative idea!  Consider coffee from Mystic Monks!

Your Laugh For Today!

I have to agree with Lifesite News that this thing is funny!  Click here if you can't see embedded video.



It's billed as "an expose of the National Organization for Marriage".   And get this!  Are you sitting down?  According to this, "NOM actually maintains close ties with (gasp!) the Mormon church, the Catholic Church hierarchy, as well as right-wing evangelical pastors".  Oh, the perfidy, the shock and scandal of it all!!

Now that you've recovered from your fainting attacks, why not take a stroll over to NOM's website?  You'll notice that NOM makes no secret of its relationships - and why should it?  The defense of marriage as a God-ordained indissoluable union between one man and one woman is an honorable undertaking.

The outfit that produced the tripe that you just watched call themselves "NOM Exposed".  Well, let's take a stroll over to their website.  Right off the bat we see that this is a project of the Human Rights Campaign.  They, of course, are a "gay rights" outfit.  Consider the source.