- Establishment Catholic media - for example, the official publications of the various dioceses
- Dissident media - examples include the publications of Catholics For Free Choice, New Ways, etc.
- Reactionary media - Under this category he places the Remnant, Catholic Family News
- Secular media - Washington Post, Boston Globe
Below is the video. As you watch it, please bear these posts in mind. They pertain to Vortexes that he put up several months ago. As background, he is responding to criticisms from others for not pointing out the pope's faults. In my own posts I acknowledged he had the right to determine his own policies in what he published. Where I did take exception was his lambasting us who did point out dubious papal doings and sayings.
Since the time of those regrettable posts, the number of papal gaffes have multiplied to such an extent that no reasonable person can escape noticing them and that is evident in the video below. Pay close attention to his conversations with Edward Pentin (particularly at the 12:20 mark) and Christina Niles (particularly at 36:00 as she speaks of "right diagnosis"). Perhaps it was the muck and mire proceeding from last October's sin-nod that proved the tipping point; who knows?
As far as that first grouping of "establishment Catholic media" goes, one such outlet can be thanked for the origin of this blog. The Catholic Standard's obstinate refusal to acknowledge the problems in the DC chancery left me no alternative but to start this to get the truth out. Now the video:
As far as that first grouping of "establishment Catholic media" goes, one such outlet can be thanked for the origin of this blog. The Catholic Standard's obstinate refusal to acknowledge the problems in the DC chancery left me no alternative but to start this to get the truth out. Now the video:
