US Bishops Can't Be Bothered As God Is Publicly Insulted

Two troubling events happened this past week.  First, on May 6, President Biden addressed a gathering that commemorated the National Day of Prayer.  Usually, when we speak of prayer, we speak of approaching Our Lord.  Therefore, we'd hope that any address given during that gathering would touch upon that aspect of prayer.  That didn't happen.  For the first time in US history, a US president gave a talk at the National Day of Prayer without so much as mentioning God once.  The internet was ablaze with this news.  Below I will post Franklin Graham's reaction to that travesty.

Two days later in Alberta Canada, Pastor Artur Pawlowski, with Dawid Pawloski, was arrested while on the road from a church service that he had just conducted.  His high crime and misdemeanor?  "Inciting" people to attend a church service.  Yes, the thugs used the word "inciting".  He already had to deal with police barging into his church during services.  I have the video of that altercation below.

A fair amount of outrage (not enough, in my humble opinion) has been generated by these two acts of official disregard for God.  Yet the Catholic prelates of both countries (United States and Canada) have uttered nary a peep regarding these two matters.  Whatever happened to bishops acting like bishops, to standing up for Our Lord against de facto tyrants?  Your Excellencies, we await your answers. Meanwhile, we will salute these two Protestant pastors (Graham and Pawlowski) who act more Catholic than you.

Temper Tantrums Of The Left

Some precious snowflakes, mainly at college campuses, find themselves "traumatized" by Trump's victory over Hillary.  The administrators of these "institutes of higher learning", are all too happy to validate these temper tantrums since they themselves find their agendas frustrated by Hillary's defeat.  Examples?

• Virginia Tech is offering "safe places" for Hillary supporters to snivel.
• Cornell University is holding "cry-ins" 
• The University of Pennsylvania is offering "breathing space", complete with puppies to cuddle along with chocolate and tea.
• A professor at Yale University is letting some poor traumatized dears skip their mid-terms without detriment to their grades.
• (Not college-relatd) There are some Californians who are now launching efforts to have California secede from the United States.  If it's feasible, I say good riddance.  They can take Nancy Pelosi, Moonbeam, Barbara Boxer, Holly-weird, etc with them.

There are more such examples.  It's bad enough that we seem to be coddling whining and temper tantrums, but the tantrums are becoming quite violent.  Calls are mounting on social media for the assassination of Trump.  My colleague at Les Femmes put up posts over the past few days of kids being assaulted at school for simply posting their views.  On Pamela Geller's site we see videos of anti-Trump violence being perpetrated by the same bunch that ballyhooed "love trumps hate".  Truthfeed has dug up ads on Craigslist posted by George Soros to gin up the riots that are now occurring.

Some voices of sanity are to be found on the internet.  Reacting to the election, Cardinal Burke said quite plainly in an interview that Trump is preferable to Hillary (#nevertrump people, take note).  Similarly, Franklin Graham posted that "The Lord Saves Us from a Godless, Atheistic Agenda".  He's quite correct.

Now what is the opinion of Pope Francis?  Perhaps the most recent interview with Eugenio Scalfari might offer some clue.  Stating that his main concern is "refugees", he opined that "it is the communists who think like Christians. Christ spoke of a society where the poor, the weak and the marginalized have the right to decide. Not demagogues, not Barabbas"  He evinces (once again) his disregard for the statement of Pope Pius XI, "no one at the same time can be a good Catholic and a true socialist."  Moreover, I fail to detect any corroboration for this statement of the pope when he said that Christ spoke of a society where the "poor" and not "demagogues" can "decide".  Who are the poor versus demagogues and what is being decided?  What are the Scriptural references?  Is the pope being intentionally nebulous?  One Peter Five has good analysis.

I glean from all this that the pope doesn't share the opinions of Cardinal Burke and the faithful Catholics who helped propel Trump over Clinton and perhaps saved the United States and western civilization from irreparable harm.

Obana Adminstrative Sourpusses Staff - Contemplating Unemployment

Franklin Graham Tells Truth About Fate Of Unrepentant Sinners

In light of the blitzkrieg attack that the gay-nazis and their progressive cronies are waging upon Jesus Christ and His Church vis-a-vis #mowwidge and the celebration of sexual perversion, I'd suggest we all listen to the words of Rev Franklin Graham.  He spells out the truth when he says that those who engage in such sins risk eternal hell fire.

Many should hear and obey it.  That is doubly true for those who've received the Sacrament of Holy Orders and are commissioned to preach the truth.  Sadly, too many of them demure from their task and even punish those priests who courageously endeavor to do so.  That means you, Cardinals Wuerl and Dolan!

Missing The Mark On The Definition Of Marriage

Father Marcel Guarnizo recently released an article detailing his thoughts on Obergefell v Hodges in particular and why many good Catholics are losing the battle in part due to faulty understanding of what constitutes marriage.  I won't rehash Father's article on this post, but urge all to study it as it appears on the Pewsitter site.  Reverend Franklin Graham also offered his own reflections on marriage. The tweets by Graham were written before the ruling was announced but they still are relevant as they hearken back to marriage as God ordained it when He created Adam and Eve.  These two men do understand the issues at play here and sound the clarion call to recall the true definitions of marriage as a divinely ordained institution.

In contrast are some very pathetic instances of dissembling of clergymen before the onslaughts of the gay-nazis.  For some, they are quite blatant about their approval of mortal sin.  Others seem to display mere cowardice and/or stupidity; hopefully that display is not merely a smoke screen to camouflage their own approval of depravity.

• On Fox News a few days ago, their in-house Catholic commentator, Father Jonathan Morris uttered sheer nonsense when he said that county clerks could issue marriage licenses to sodomites without incurring sin themselves.  If signing a marriage license for a sinful situation is not formal and material cooperation with mortal sin, what is?  Father Morris has a sister, a lesbian, who is in a #mowwidge relationship.
• Father Guarnizo pointed out the error in making the procreation of children a focus during the Supreme Court arguments.  Some clergy have gotten even sloppier, framing the issue as merely one of religious freedom.  In other words, they are more concerned with threats to their own liberties (and yes, they are real threats), than they are about the inherent offense to God.  Take for example this statement from an Alabama priest.
• Then we have this disgusting situation from Fordham University, a Jesuit institution in New York.  "Jesuit" and "New York" are indeed harbingers of disaster.  The chair of the theology department entered into a #mowwidge with his sodomite accomplice.  Rather than fire him, the school administration has extended to him and his "husband" the typical wedding wishes.  The sodomites conducted their #mowwidge in an Episcopal Church where the sodomite accomplice is a (sit down!) youth minister!  I'm sure Georgetown University is jealous of Fordham, but I digress.

We have so much gay rot in the Church it's no wonder why we can't withstand the assaults from without.  Before we address the culture at large, we have so much house-cleaning to do first.

More from the "Niggers of the New Age" Department

As mentioned before, I coined that term to describe how faithful Catholics, and others who hold to traditional Judeo-Christian principles, are being treated by the so-called "elite" in this country and in other western countries.  The bigotry thrown in our faces is becoming more and more blatant, with apparent consent of the political power brokers (with some notable exceptions).  This is happening solely because our witness to true Christian morality stings the collective conscience of post-modern society.

Among those so maltreated is the Reverend Franklin Graham.  He was disinvited from a Pentagon prayer service for daring to declare the truth about Islam's inherent embrace of murder and terrorism.  Yesterday he granted to Newmax an exclusive interview regarding that debacle.  Mr. Graham lays the blame for the debacle on the White House, perhaps at the feet of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, the Messiah Most Miserable himself.  I believe he's spot-on correct.  Read it, and watch the video.

Pentagon Wimps Out, Disinvites Franklin Graham

The United States Army has disgraced itself by pandering to the politically correct elite, and has disinvited Franklin Graham from the Pentagon Prayer Day.  The Army said that Franklin's comments about Islam were "inappropriate". 

"Inappropriate"?  Was it "appropriate" of Muslims to crash jets on September 11, 2001 - one being at the Pentagon?  Was it "appropriate" of a Muslim to go on a shooting rampage in Fort Hood?

Franklin Graham simply told the truth.  Truth, by nature, pays no obeisance to "inclusiveness".  If the Army is spouting this blather, they may as well call off the "war on terror", as they are now blinding themselves willingly to the terrorists. 

Why, oh why, do I think the reputed Commander in Chief brought pressure to bear???

How to Endanger American Troops?

Why, that's easy!  The answer is, "invite Franklin Graham to speak at the Pentagon during the National Day of Prayer on May 6th".  (Yes, Obama-philes!  There IS a National Day of Prayer!)

Now just how does the son of Billy Graham earn such acolades?  Well, it seems that he had the honesty and courage to call Islam an "evil" religion after adherents of the so-called "religion of peace" did their "peaceful" actions on September 11, 2001.  Thus he would offend Muslims who work at the Pentagon, says the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

That's odd!  I don't recall Mr. Graham being at Fort Hood during that shooting several months ago.  Enough of the political correctness run amok!

Could this be a reason why that dopey judge tried to rule that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional?