Military Chaplains - Targeted For Court Martial

It seems that the Pentagon is vetting its religious tolerance policy with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation - a group that has compared Christian evangelism to "rape".  Its president, Mikey Weinstein, claims that Christians who proselytize are "guilty of sedition and treason".  He says a number of ridiculous things about Christians that only betray his own irrational hatred and yes, bigotry against Christians.  He obviously wants his bigotry ensconced in military policy.  Regarding "rape", Weinstein targeted his venom at Christians in saying proselytizing is "a version of being spiritually raped by fundamentalist Christian religious predators."

Weinstein also claimed that proselytizing is (wait for it!) "a national security threat".  So let me get this straight.  We have an absolutely porous border in the southwest, we still don't have clear answers on what happened in Benghazi, we are obviously dealing with jihadist "sleeper cells" as evidenced in Boston - and the Pentagon is doubling down on Christian chaplains?  Why is Weinstein being allowed to give this input?  Is the Pentagon at least entertaining input from Christian chaplains?  Who's the Commander in Chief anyway?  On second thought, maybe that last question answered the preceding questions.

We need to keep a close eye on this, as there is an obvious attempt to purge Christians from the military.  It's not hard to figure out why: because they recognize God as Supreme Authority.

More from the "Niggers of the New Age" Department

As mentioned before, I coined that term to describe how faithful Catholics, and others who hold to traditional Judeo-Christian principles, are being treated by the so-called "elite" in this country and in other western countries.  The bigotry thrown in our faces is becoming more and more blatant, with apparent consent of the political power brokers (with some notable exceptions).  This is happening solely because our witness to true Christian morality stings the collective conscience of post-modern society.

Among those so maltreated is the Reverend Franklin Graham.  He was disinvited from a Pentagon prayer service for daring to declare the truth about Islam's inherent embrace of murder and terrorism.  Yesterday he granted to Newmax an exclusive interview regarding that debacle.  Mr. Graham lays the blame for the debacle on the White House, perhaps at the feet of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, the Messiah Most Miserable himself.  I believe he's spot-on correct.  Read it, and watch the video.

Pentagon Wimps Out, Disinvites Franklin Graham

The United States Army has disgraced itself by pandering to the politically correct elite, and has disinvited Franklin Graham from the Pentagon Prayer Day.  The Army said that Franklin's comments about Islam were "inappropriate". 

"Inappropriate"?  Was it "appropriate" of Muslims to crash jets on September 11, 2001 - one being at the Pentagon?  Was it "appropriate" of a Muslim to go on a shooting rampage in Fort Hood?

Franklin Graham simply told the truth.  Truth, by nature, pays no obeisance to "inclusiveness".  If the Army is spouting this blather, they may as well call off the "war on terror", as they are now blinding themselves willingly to the terrorists. 

Why, oh why, do I think the reputed Commander in Chief brought pressure to bear???

How to Endanger American Troops?

Why, that's easy!  The answer is, "invite Franklin Graham to speak at the Pentagon during the National Day of Prayer on May 6th".  (Yes, Obama-philes!  There IS a National Day of Prayer!)

Now just how does the son of Billy Graham earn such acolades?  Well, it seems that he had the honesty and courage to call Islam an "evil" religion after adherents of the so-called "religion of peace" did their "peaceful" actions on September 11, 2001.  Thus he would offend Muslims who work at the Pentagon, says the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

That's odd!  I don't recall Mr. Graham being at Fort Hood during that shooting several months ago.  Enough of the political correctness run amok!

Could this be a reason why that dopey judge tried to rule that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional?