I knew Time would chop and dice the words of the seminarians to suit their sick fancies. Sadly, I believe that was the intent of the DC chancery, given the next slop-job synod that is on the horizon. None too surprisingly, other faux-katholyc rags are glomming onto the Time piece. The Not-At-All Catholic Reporter released their screed yesterday, based on the Time piece. I have to hand it to them; at least they're honest about their dreams to tear the sacred priesthood to shreds.
The author of this glop is Pat Periello, a Baltimore native. I wonder if he's related to Tom Periello? If anyone knows, please drop me a line in the comments section. Pat was a former seminarian at St. Mary's in Baltimore. Was he there during the days when St. Mary's was known as the "pink palace"? But I digress.
As you read the NCR piece, you'll see the dubious reasons for Periello's even more dubious "high hopes":
- "priests being able to marry"
- "priesthood that includes women in significant numbers"
- "less driven by doctrine"
- "espouse legalization of marijuana"
- "position of generally not preaching on abortion"
These are the kinds of "hopes" that will send souls to hell.
Why, oh why, do I think these two articles are part of a coordinated plan to cajole Catholics into accepting pig-slop that will probably emanate from this upcoming synod on young people and vocations?
Why, oh why, do I think these two articles are part of a coordinated plan to cajole Catholics into accepting pig-slop that will probably emanate from this upcoming synod on young people and vocations?