More Thoughts On The Food Police

Look at that video that I posted on Friday with Elmo.  Notice the title?  "Elmo Doesn't Fear Obama's School Lunch".   Odd, isn't it?  Perhaps they're telling us more than they realize - the proverbial "Freudian slip", as it were.

First, there's "Elmo doesn't fear".  Doesn't it seem like they're trying to quell our instinctive revulsion to interference from On High?  This is quite characteristic of any entity that is trying to exert undue force or coercion on another - disarm their natural protective instincts by subtly making the victim feel silly for having reactions of fear - fear that has very real basis.  It's a brainwashing, thought-reform technique.

Then there's "Obama's school lunch".  Where to begin with that one?  Let's just start anywhere.

• We have here the bald-faced admission that this attempt at control originated with the Messiah Most Miserable himself.  This is his program, and you Great Unwashed better fall in line - right now!  Will the lunch trays now bear that "O" symbol on them?
• Obama claims to be the President of the United States.  As far as I'm concerned, there is the teensy matter of his birth status that has yet to be resolved, but that's fodder for another post.  At any rate, if he is indeed president, then the US Constitution clearly spells out the duties that are within his purview.  I've read the Constitution.  I've looked up and down, right and left, front and back, and I can see no mention whatsoever of any authority of the President to determine the diets of anyone in the United States.  But the video clearly states "Obama's school lunch".  The White House produced this thing - courtesy of your tax dollars, hard at work!

Whether or not we fear Obama's lunch or not, why must our school children eat it?  What is to be feared and yes, hated and resisted, is this shameless attempt of Big Brother, Nanny-State, Nazi-wannabee Government to bust its big bazoo into our personal lives and take dominion over us.  This crap about being concerned "for the children" is a flimsy, shallow excuse through which most school children can see, "Elmo's" little schtick not withstanding.

Michelle Obama - "Obese Children...National Security Issue"

A week or so ago, we heard Janet Napolitano tell us that "climate change" is a national security threat.  Well, since that fad has died its quick death, we have a new security threat!  Are you biting your fingernails yet?  Well, here it is, from Mrs Messiah herself!  Click here if you can't see embedded video.



She, of course, is talking of the so-called "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act".  She claims that obesity is a "national security threat" because supposedly recruits are coming in overweight.  Michelle, what else is new?  One of the purposes of basic training is to get the recruits in shape.  That's how it's always been - that is, until training standards were dumbed down so that women, etc could "pass".

She also claims this bill will "save lives".  My, my!  She shares her husband's messianic delusions of grandeur.  As he looks on, he must be jealous of her since she is obviously not dependent on a teleprompter - but I digress!  Now note, on the video, at the 1:40 marker, where she states "we can't just leave it up to the parents".  Oh, yes we can.  And we accomplish that by getting rid of the structures and bureaucracies that subvert and undermine parental authority and perogative in their children's lives.  Do we hear the nanny-socialist state rattling its saber here?  Watch out for the "fat police" coming our way!

To further reimforce the nanny state (to propagandize children and those of childish minds), watch this condescending tripe which was produced with your tax dollars!  Click here if you can't see embedded video. 



You did notice, of course, that there's none of that nasty red meat, right?  Well, maybe after that school subverts Elmo's parents and feeds him a politically-correct diet, they can teach him proper language skills so that the poor little thing no longer speaks of himself in the third person.

Before any snide progressives snipe at me for belittling the Obamas' "concern for children", remember that they are both rabidly pro-abortion.  Recall all that talk of "future promise" in the first video?  Well, what we see now is only 66% of the "promise" that God sent, as 1/3 of unborn children are murdered in their mothers' wombs - murders that the Obamas have worked hard to facilitate!