Wednesday, October 25, 2023
Maryland Company That Incinerated Aborted Babies Fined By The State
Tuesday, April 5, 2022
Press Conference Regarding The Pro-lifers Who Kept The Murdered Babies From Being Incinerated - GOP Lawmakers Call DC Mayor On The Carpet
Yesterday I stated that those involved in the retrieval of the babies murdered by Santangelo would hold a press conference. They have done so, and here it is.
After that, nothing said was that much of a surprise. The facts made quite obvious that the DC police and Department of Justice were colluding to prevent any examination of the 3rd-trimester babies who seemed to have been murdered by means forbidden by Federal law.
That collusion has by no means escaped the notice of several GOP lawmakers. Led by James Lankford and Jim Jordon, the lawmakers are demanding that Mayor Bowser and the Department of Justice do their duties. It's a pity that no Democrat lawmakers signed onto this letter, but they are only abiding by the pro-abortion plank of their party of death and mayhem.
John-Henry Weston of LifeSiteNews engaged in an interview with Lauren Handy regarding these recent events. Read and listen https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/exclusive-pro-life-hero-raided-by-fbi-speaks-about-the-aborted-babies-she-was-trying-to-honor
#justiceforthefive
Monday, April 4, 2022
Eggs Are On The Faces Of DC Police And DOJ After Nazi-Like Treatment Of Nine Pro-Life Activists
In researching this matter, I was reminded that Santangelo was visited by pro-life activists in 2013, unbeknownst to him at the time. Lila Rose and her Live Action group have long been known for undercover stings of abortuaries, catching them flouting the law. A pregnant associate of Live Action conducted an interview with Santangelo and asked him what he would do if a baby he aborted survived the procedure. Santangelo said that he would not help such a child, admitting that he would violate the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. ABC published a report here.
In light of Live Action’s
efforts, Handy had reason to suspect that these babies were murdered via abortion
procedures that violated the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban and the Born-Alive
Infants Protection Act. She probably also hoped to give them a decent funeral, as opposed to letting them be incinerated by
Curtis Bay like so much garbage. After
prayer and consultation with other activists, she decided, through a lawyer, to
contact DC authorities to have them examine the babies’ bodies for violations
of the afore-mentioned federal laws.
Please
notice that this letter was both emailed and mailed on March 29, 2022. Label on box containing babies
| Letter asking for DC examination |
This was the same abortuary where Handy, along with eight other pro-life activists, conducted a rescue on October 22, 2020. The other eight are: Jonathan Darnel, 40, of Arlington, Virginia, Jay Smith, 32, of Freeport, New York; Paulette Harlow, 73, of Kingston, Massachusetts; Jean Marshall, 72, of Kingston, Massachusetts; John Hinshaw, 67, of Levittown, New York; Heather Idoni, 61, of Linden, Michigan; William Goodman, 52, of the Bronx, New York; and Joan Bell, 74, of Montague, New Jersey.
Last February, the Department of Justice convened a grand jury to review the “charges”, having sworn in the jury on February 15. The nine defendants received no notice of these proceedings. The DOJ filed the indictments on March 24 and only unsealed them on March 30, the date of the arrests. It is also the day after the DC authorities received Mr. Cooley’s email that detailed Handy's wish to hand over the babies for official examination. Isn’t that just the most convenient of coincidences?
At the time of their arrests, they were at their respective homes. The arrests took place between 5am and 8am. In other words, some of them were awakened to cops banging on their doors for a non-violent life-saving action of over a year ago. Father David Nix has video of one of the arrests: at gun-point, forcing some pro-lifers to their knees, etc. The Department of Justice statement can be viewed here.
The activists were released later in the day. As Handy returned to her DC home, she found that it was being raided by DC police. Mainstream media waxed predictably horrified over the bodies in Handy’s home, stating that the police were acting on an “anonymous tip”. Cooley’s letter, initiated by Handy herself, was that “anonymous tip”.
DC Police Executive Assist. Chief of Police Ashan M. Benedict told reporters Thursday "the fetuses appeared to have been aborted in accordance with D.C. law. There doesn't appear to be anything criminal about that — except for how they got into that house," Benedict said. My! Wasn’t that a lickety-split examination? In other words, “nothing to see here, folks! Move along.” Acting surprised regarding the babies at Handy’s home, Benedict’s nose appears to have grown an inch or two.
Handy and others did videos of the children before they were confiscated by the DC police. Live Action was given the videos, and affiliated physicians (including a former abortionist) examined them. They opine that illegal abortions may have been perpetrated on the children. More details are found at this site. Be warned, this site shows the violated bodies of these poor babies in detail.
Let’s cut to the chase and sum this up. The DC government, having received the email from Cooley, knew that they would be obliged to examine the bodies in accordance with Handy’s request. Being in the back pockets of the abortion industry in DC, they connived to discredit Handy. Knowing that Handy and others conducted a rescue at Santangelo’s one and a half years ago, and that the Department of Justice was sitting on an indictment of which the defendants were unaware, they worked with the DOJ and the FBI to act on that indictment to arrest Handy and the others. That served the purpose of getting Handy out of her home so that the DC police could conduct their raid. It gave credence to their narrative that Handy was surreptitiously keeping the babies in her home to paint her as an imbalanced “anti-choice extremist”, knowing full well that she intended to have the babies examined through legal channels. They wanted to give cover to Santangelo and to the abortion industry in general.
As for those poor babies, I suspect they will never receive a dignified funeral. Most likely they will wind up in some incinerator. By the way, Curtis Bay has drawn the ire of neighboring Dundalk residents for the putrid stenches that they put forth. Now Dundalk knows that they have been inhaling, among other things, the remains of murdered babies.
Progressive Anti-Abortion
Uprising (PAAU), an organization with which Lauren Handy is affiliated, will
hold a press conference on Tuesday, April 5, at 11am at the Hyatt Regency
Washington on Capitol Hill. In that conference
they will answer some questions:
· Where did the
aborted babies come from?
· Did the
Metropolitan Police Department test for oxygen in the lungs of these babies?
· Why did those
arrested by the FBI choose Washington Surgi-Clinic for their protest?
· How were the fetal
remains acquired?
· Who obtained the
fetal remains?
· How many aborted
fetuses were acquired in total, besides the five in police custody?
· What will happen
to the remaining aborted fetuses (that have not been turned over to police)?
· Where are the fetuses
now?
· What would have
happened to these fetal remains had they not been recovered?
· What demands are
the defendants, and those who obtained the aborted babies making of the
Department of Justice?
· Who is Dr. Cesare Santangelo, and what is his role in the deaths of these children?
As soon as I am able to do
so, I will post video of that press conference.
Monday, December 21, 2020
Bishop Schneider On The Covid Vaccine Witchs' Brew
Notice that this video is posted not on youtube but Rumble. Youtube has seen fit to censor the videos of LifeSiteNews, most likely because giggles is also towing the progressive line for the tin-horn dictators (that's why I deliberately misspelled the name). This deserves a listen.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
The Necessity Of Infant Baptism - Sidewalk Counselors Take Note
Well, I'd hope that these "souls" include those of the unborn children. Without sacramental baptism, they won't attain heaven. They most certainly are our first priority. I now link to a commentary by Dr Taylor Marshall on a bull against abortion issued by Pope Sixtus V in the 1500s (it was a problem back then). Now listen to this homily on the topic; I find it to be quite thorough.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Illegal Dumping At Carhart's Germantown Abortuary
- Sensitive patient information including driver license photocopies and other private information.
- Bloody sanitary napkins, some of which contained fetal remains.
- Bottles of IV drugs that are classified as controlled substances.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Update On Senomyx Situation
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Abortion Must Be Shown, If It Is To Be Stopped
![]() |
| Innocent Victim of "Choice" |
We don't seem to have that reaction in other facets of life, now - do we? Remember your driver's education courses? It seems like every other session we were being shown films of gory auto accidents. Of course these were show to induce the 16-year-old students to exercise care behind the wheel. The various cancer societies will sponsor tv ads or billboards that compare healthy lungs to diseased lungs.
We all know that pictures of black protesters being hosed down brought the civil rights movement to national attention in the 1960s, as did the little girl burned by napalm for the Vietnam war. As we faced our squeemishness then, so must we do today.
I speak to many in diocesan pro-life offices (and you know who you are, and I may start exposing some of you!). Don't like the pictures? Too bad! If you're serious about ending abortion, you will mortify your reluctance to show the pictures as the temptation to evil that it is. Get over your reluctance, put some steel in your spinal columns and do your jobs - regardless of the progressive lemmings that occupy other diocesan offices. At the very least, stop shunning those who do take the heat and who do have the guts and integrity to tell the truth as it needs to be told.
I know there are some who are hurting from abortions, or who care for those who so hurt. What I said holds for you, too. I have seen the display of these pictures save mothers and babies. That is, they prevent other women from undergoing the horrific experience of abortion. What? Should we cover over the pictures? Should we cover over the truth that may save a mother and a baby? Should another woman undergo that wrenching experience because others didn't want to experience discomfort? Such would be false compassion, with deadly consequences. Think long and hard before you criticize the use of the pictures.
Mark Crutcher of Life Dynamics has a number of these pictures. I particularly invite any pro-choice reader to view these, to see the results of such choice, and to understand why some "choices" are immoral. Here's an account by Father Pavone about a pro-choice person who changed her mind after she saw the pictures.
