The above scandal happened during yet another in-flight interview yesterday. From LifeSiteNews we read that reminisced about an audience he held with two lesbians. I reported on that here. One of the women mutilated herself with both surgery and hormones to give herself a more masculine appearance. In that blog post I opined that we did not know the Vatican's account of what occurred during that audience. During that plane ride yesterday, we were apprised of it and sadly it does corroborate what the two lesbians said.
As mentioned, the woman legally changed her name to "Diego". I will refer to her as that since I don't know what her given name is. However, I will refer to her as she actually is - female. Anything else would be completely dishonest and beholden to the demons of political correctness.
The pope, though, insists on condoning and conforming to that demonic linguistic deception. He refers to Diego as "he". The pope even said that Diego and her partner in perversion got "married". Of course they didn't, pretenses notwithstanding. States Pope Francis regarding Diego: "He wrote me a letter saying that, for him, it would be a consolation to come [see me] with his wife. I received them and they were very happy," Pope Francis added. Clarifying his use of pronouns, the pope said, "He that was her but is he."
I could spend paragraphs unpacking this mess. We literally have to start with the first word for Diego is not a "he" but a "she". I think the pope tries to cover over his blunder with the sorry excuse for a pronoun clarification (the underlined quote) but flubs that badly. "Was her"? Nope! She still is a "her" and never, ever will be a man. That is NOT how God created her and to acquiesce to that demonic language is to stick a finger in the eye of God Himself who created Diego as a woman. Think of the audacity of contradicting God's will to accommodate perverted caprices; that is what the Pope has done in his selection of language: including that so-called "clarification"!
Let that last part sink in, if you will. In adopting this very faulty language, the Vicar of Christ is in fact contradicting God Himself who created Diego and positively willed that she be referred to as a woman. I don't know about this bishop "accompanying" this woman, but it sure seems like this bishop and this pope are accompanying the woman - as they walk far from God, His Church and straight towards hell, barring their conversions to the One True Faith.