George Neumayr has been doggedly pursuing the truth regarding the gay mafia that in many ways governs the Church hierarchy in the United States. He has been most active in this locality. Recently we have learned that his efforts have borne fruit - in the Archdiocese of Washington and the Diocese of Wilmington.
In the Diocese of Wilmington, Neumayr discovered that a member of that diocese's marriage was, to say the least, not qualified to hold that position. The now-former member was Jack Anderson. He's an ex-priest. He and another ex-priest, Ted Olson, are shacking up together in sodomite perversion and are pretending to be "married". And this is what Wilmington had sitting on its marriage tribunal. It's very much like having Larry Flint or Hugh Hefner draft a program to teach chastity to Catholic children. Thanks to Neumayr's expose and the subsequent outrage from faithful Catholics, Anderson was removed from the tribunal. I find it somewhat difficult to believe that the diocese wasn't aware of Anderson's mortally sinful lifestyle. Moreover, his ties to Msgr Walter Rossi are known.
Speaking of Msgr Rossi, he is under investigation for his own homosexual dalliances and predations. For history, see this Church Militant piece, one by Neumayr and my own anthology of posts. Yesterday it was announced that he was granted a leave of absence from the Board of Trustees of Catholic University of America. If you watched the Theology on Tap video, you'll notice that at that time, the archbishop indicated that he would not remove Rossi pending the investigation's outcome. I believe that is contrary to Canon Law. Moreover, while he is off the CUA board for now, does he still remain as rector of the National Shrine? Were the powers-that-be just tossing little bones our way?
Showing posts with label Msgr Rossi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Msgr Rossi. Show all posts
Sunday, September 22, 2019
Thursday, August 15, 2019
Rossi To Be Investigated And Absp Gregory Botches Theology On Tap
As many know, Catholic journalist George Neumayr has been unearthing scandalous details regarding Msgr Walter Rossi's perverted misdeeds. Now comes the announcement from the Diocese of Scranton (Rossi's diocese) that both Bishop Bambera and Archbishop Wilton Gregory will conduct a joint "forensic investigation" into the allegations regarding Rossi.
Archbishop Gregory had to have known that we would never let the Rossi matter fade from the memories of Catholics. Not only was there my 5-second reminder to him this past Saturday, but at yesterday's "Theology on Tap" session, the first question from the audience was in regard to the Rossi matter. You'll find that at the 17-minute marker.
One other teensy little news item might have served as impetus for at least putting up a facade of an investigation (if that is what it is). Church Militant has published the news that James Grein, the man whom McCarrick savaged for years is now filing a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the Vatican and the Archdiocese of New York for doing absolutely nothing about the abuse that he suffered. Perhaps that is not a factor behind Gregory's present decision to do something about Rossi, but often money is a key motivating factor for our errant shepherds. My blogging colleague, A Washington DC Catholic, has additional questions regarding this matter.
Before we all entertain wild hopes that some changes might be coming to the Archdiocese, please be advised that the rest of that video will snap you back to reality. The camera is always facing the archbishop, so we can't see those posing the questions and I find the questions somewhat inaudible. Gregory's responses, though, are rather distressing. At the 20-minute mark, in reply to someone from St Matthew's about those engaged in perversions (not his terms), Gregory rehashes his deplorable track record in Atlanta and sings the praises of dissident priest Fr James Martin and a sodomite-enabling bunch called Fortunate Families. One glance at that web page will leave no doubt as to the spiritual poison to be found therein.
At the 30-minute mark, we hear from someone who identifies him/herself as a "transgender Catholic". Again, the camera faces Gregory and the acoustics are poor, so I've no way of telling if that person was male or female. At least I have a reasonable excuse. Anyway, he/she asks "what place do I have in the church?". To that Gregory responds "right in the heart of the Church". He added that Jesus "engaged such people". Well, not as equals, Your Excellency! He always called sinners to repentance, not "accompaniment". Of course all the liberals clapped and whistled over that nonsense. It's nonsense because the bishop of the local Church failed to preach repentance from the mortal sins of perversion as a necessary step to eternal life.
In Washington DC, the swamp will be fetid for quite some time.
Archbishop Gregory had to have known that we would never let the Rossi matter fade from the memories of Catholics. Not only was there my 5-second reminder to him this past Saturday, but at yesterday's "Theology on Tap" session, the first question from the audience was in regard to the Rossi matter. You'll find that at the 17-minute marker.
One other teensy little news item might have served as impetus for at least putting up a facade of an investigation (if that is what it is). Church Militant has published the news that James Grein, the man whom McCarrick savaged for years is now filing a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the Vatican and the Archdiocese of New York for doing absolutely nothing about the abuse that he suffered. Perhaps that is not a factor behind Gregory's present decision to do something about Rossi, but often money is a key motivating factor for our errant shepherds. My blogging colleague, A Washington DC Catholic, has additional questions regarding this matter.
Before we all entertain wild hopes that some changes might be coming to the Archdiocese, please be advised that the rest of that video will snap you back to reality. The camera is always facing the archbishop, so we can't see those posing the questions and I find the questions somewhat inaudible. Gregory's responses, though, are rather distressing. At the 20-minute mark, in reply to someone from St Matthew's about those engaged in perversions (not his terms), Gregory rehashes his deplorable track record in Atlanta and sings the praises of dissident priest Fr James Martin and a sodomite-enabling bunch called Fortunate Families. One glance at that web page will leave no doubt as to the spiritual poison to be found therein.
At the 30-minute mark, we hear from someone who identifies him/herself as a "transgender Catholic". Again, the camera faces Gregory and the acoustics are poor, so I've no way of telling if that person was male or female. At least I have a reasonable excuse. Anyway, he/she asks "what place do I have in the church?". To that Gregory responds "right in the heart of the Church". He added that Jesus "engaged such people". Well, not as equals, Your Excellency! He always called sinners to repentance, not "accompaniment". Of course all the liberals clapped and whistled over that nonsense. It's nonsense because the bishop of the local Church failed to preach repentance from the mortal sins of perversion as a necessary step to eternal life.
In Washington DC, the swamp will be fetid for quite some time.
Sunday, August 4, 2019
Thugs At The Shrine
No, I do not refer to criminals lurking outside the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. I refer to those employed by the Shrine.
First, I will relate a story to put this in context. About 20 years ago, I visited the Shrine on a monthly basis (approximately) to go to Confession and peruse the book store. At that time, the security staff was comprised of older, even elderly, men who quite frankly would never have been able to handle a real security emergency. On one visit, I was strolling through the cafeteria and for some reason that I cannot fathom, I attracted the attention of a man who was obviously mentally imbalanced. He followed me and demanded that I wait at his beck and call. I loudly demanded that he back off and walked into a women's rest room. I waited, hoping he'd loose interest and go away. He didn't. When I emerged, he started right back up and again I had to yell at him to back off and don't dare follow me. Again, this was in the cafeteria. There were at least three of the less-than-intrepid security staff sitting by, watching the entire confrontation - and making not one damned move to assist me. He didn't follow me and I left. Needless to say, my visits to the Shrine were greatly reduced after that.
Fast forward to today. We now have a rogue security staff, directed by a gay-mafia Msgr Walter Rossi ejecting George Neumayr for asking questions. They even lied about having a legal order to eject Neumayr from Shrine property.
In the course of researching his treatment at the hands of Shrine staff, he learned that a key security staffer at the Shrine has an actual crime history replete with violent crimes. Rossi may well be covering for this fellow owing to a past friendship with his father. But what the heck? Covering up the crimes of each other seems to be a favorite course of action for this local gay-mafia that infects this Shrine and Archdiocese.
Now I wonder how my encounter of 20 years ago would have been resolved had this criminal been in charge of Shrine security at that time? There probably would have been no difference.
First, I will relate a story to put this in context. About 20 years ago, I visited the Shrine on a monthly basis (approximately) to go to Confession and peruse the book store. At that time, the security staff was comprised of older, even elderly, men who quite frankly would never have been able to handle a real security emergency. On one visit, I was strolling through the cafeteria and for some reason that I cannot fathom, I attracted the attention of a man who was obviously mentally imbalanced. He followed me and demanded that I wait at his beck and call. I loudly demanded that he back off and walked into a women's rest room. I waited, hoping he'd loose interest and go away. He didn't. When I emerged, he started right back up and again I had to yell at him to back off and don't dare follow me. Again, this was in the cafeteria. There were at least three of the less-than-intrepid security staff sitting by, watching the entire confrontation - and making not one damned move to assist me. He didn't follow me and I left. Needless to say, my visits to the Shrine were greatly reduced after that.
Fast forward to today. We now have a rogue security staff, directed by a gay-mafia Msgr Walter Rossi ejecting George Neumayr for asking questions. They even lied about having a legal order to eject Neumayr from Shrine property.
In the course of researching his treatment at the hands of Shrine staff, he learned that a key security staffer at the Shrine has an actual crime history replete with violent crimes. Rossi may well be covering for this fellow owing to a past friendship with his father. But what the heck? Covering up the crimes of each other seems to be a favorite course of action for this local gay-mafia that infects this Shrine and Archdiocese.
Now I wonder how my encounter of 20 years ago would have been resolved had this criminal been in charge of Shrine security at that time? There probably would have been no difference.
Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Mum's The Word! So Do NOT Give To The Annual Appeal!
While he slithered about the Archdiocese of Washington, ex-cardinal McCarrick maintained a personal charitable fund called the Archbishop's Fund. There seems to be reason to believe that the hundreds of thousands of dollars that flowed in and out of that "charitable fund" were actually bribes. Of course we don't know for sure because the Archdiocese refuses to answer questions about the funds: questions such as who were recipients, how much did each receive, why, etc. Right off the bat I can think of two uses that McCarrick may have had for these funds:
- Facilitation and/or damage control related to his sexual predations
- Buying of votes during the papal conclave that elected Pope Francis
- If there are other suggestions, please communicate via the comments section.
If the uses of this fund were honorable, why not disclose them? Of course when we say the "archdiocese refuses to answer", we must necessarily say that Archbishop Gregory refuses to answer those questions. And he does. Oh, by the way. This past Sunday the Archbishop received the Pallium.
In other related archdiocesan news, we recall that journalist George Neumayr was ejected from the Basilica of the Immaculate Conception. Allegedly he was being kicked out because of some legal order barring him from being on Shrine grounds. Well, guess what? No such order actually existed, according to a Shrine staffer. Surprise! See here and here. So Msgr Rossi flat out lied. There was no such order with DC Police. But speaking of Rossi and the police, it seems that Rossi himself has racked up his own rap sheet - after ordination. No, we're not talking about minor traffic tickets. We're talking about drunken driving, hit-and-run accidents. In October 2017 (less than two years ago) he was apprehended in Virginia for reckless driving and had to pay a fine (I wonder if that wound up on an expense report?).
Meanwhile our arms are being twisted to give to the "Annual Appeal". They won't even call it "Archbishop's Appeal", as if that will fool anyone. I suggest not giving one penny to that thing. Why should we pay for their bribes and drunken driving fines?
In other related archdiocesan news, we recall that journalist George Neumayr was ejected from the Basilica of the Immaculate Conception. Allegedly he was being kicked out because of some legal order barring him from being on Shrine grounds. Well, guess what? No such order actually existed, according to a Shrine staffer. Surprise! See here and here. So Msgr Rossi flat out lied. There was no such order with DC Police. But speaking of Rossi and the police, it seems that Rossi himself has racked up his own rap sheet - after ordination. No, we're not talking about minor traffic tickets. We're talking about drunken driving, hit-and-run accidents. In October 2017 (less than two years ago) he was apprehended in Virginia for reckless driving and had to pay a fine (I wonder if that wound up on an expense report?).
Meanwhile our arms are being twisted to give to the "Annual Appeal". They won't even call it "Archbishop's Appeal", as if that will fool anyone. I suggest not giving one penny to that thing. Why should we pay for their bribes and drunken driving fines?
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
The Gay Mafia In The MD/DC Church
Last week Archbishop Vigano revealed in an interview that while he was nuncio, he received numerous complaints regarding Msgr Walter Rossi, rector of the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington DC. He allegedly preyed upon male students of the Catholic University of America, where the Shrine is located. The LifeSiteNews article details Rossi's connections with now-disgraced Bishop Bransfield, as well as McCarrick and Wuerl.
Archbishop Vigano made reference to George Neumayr. The latter wrote that Rossi suggested group sex to young men who rewarded those who submitted to him and persecuted those who didn't. Several years ago, Rossi had Neumayr's name and face put on some sort of Shrine security notice and barred him from the premise. No reason was ever given. While that action is allowable at civil law, it isn't allowable at canon law.
This past Sunday on the Feast of Corpus Christi, Neumayr attempted to attend Mass and participate in the Corpus Christi procession. He was spotted and ordered to leave. Church Militant tried to follow up with the Shrine staff. As a demonstration of what the Gay Mafia church really means by "transparency", the questions were stonewalled.
It's worth noting that now-disgraced Bishop Bransfield, embroiled in his own scandals, is a predecessor of Rossi's. Allegedly he's being investigated by Archbishop Lori. But Lori is a busy man - busy about the wrong things. He and many other left-wing prelates are actively trying to undermine President Trump's efforts to deport border crashers as we see from this piece on the Archdiocese of Baltimore's site.
Please take note of several details. First, through this "parish id program", we see that the archdiocese will be giving aid and comfort to those who are willfully flouting US immigration laws. Second, this Brooks woman is slandering the men and women of ICE, characterizing their efforts as "domestic terrorism". Because the ADB published her remarks with no disclaimer, we can logically assume that they partake in her guilt of slander. Father Lewandowski takes it a step further by blustering that ICE "has to go through me first". It must also be noted that Brooks is a member of BUILD (all in the blue shirts). A simple google search of them reveals that they are an affiliate of the Industrial Areas Foundation, founded by Saul Alinsky himself.
So there you have it. Lori is dealing with Bransfield. He continues to let Father Joseph Muth and his gay-rights cronies run amok at St Matthew's Church (I believe they marched in the Baltimore Pride parade again). So now he's thumping his chest over illegals? Or is he just hankering after some of those Catholic Charity dollars?
Right now things are looking rather sordid in the leadership of both the Archdioceses of Washington and Baltimore. We will keep you abreast as you keep the church in your prayers.
Archbishop Vigano made reference to George Neumayr. The latter wrote that Rossi suggested group sex to young men who rewarded those who submitted to him and persecuted those who didn't. Several years ago, Rossi had Neumayr's name and face put on some sort of Shrine security notice and barred him from the premise. No reason was ever given. While that action is allowable at civil law, it isn't allowable at canon law.
This past Sunday on the Feast of Corpus Christi, Neumayr attempted to attend Mass and participate in the Corpus Christi procession. He was spotted and ordered to leave. Church Militant tried to follow up with the Shrine staff. As a demonstration of what the Gay Mafia church really means by "transparency", the questions were stonewalled.
It's worth noting that now-disgraced Bishop Bransfield, embroiled in his own scandals, is a predecessor of Rossi's. Allegedly he's being investigated by Archbishop Lori. But Lori is a busy man - busy about the wrong things. He and many other left-wing prelates are actively trying to undermine President Trump's efforts to deport border crashers as we see from this piece on the Archdiocese of Baltimore's site.
Please take note of several details. First, through this "parish id program", we see that the archdiocese will be giving aid and comfort to those who are willfully flouting US immigration laws. Second, this Brooks woman is slandering the men and women of ICE, characterizing their efforts as "domestic terrorism". Because the ADB published her remarks with no disclaimer, we can logically assume that they partake in her guilt of slander. Father Lewandowski takes it a step further by blustering that ICE "has to go through me first". It must also be noted that Brooks is a member of BUILD (all in the blue shirts). A simple google search of them reveals that they are an affiliate of the Industrial Areas Foundation, founded by Saul Alinsky himself.
So there you have it. Lori is dealing with Bransfield. He continues to let Father Joseph Muth and his gay-rights cronies run amok at St Matthew's Church (I believe they marched in the Baltimore Pride parade again). So now he's thumping his chest over illegals? Or is he just hankering after some of those Catholic Charity dollars?
Right now things are looking rather sordid in the leadership of both the Archdioceses of Washington and Baltimore. We will keep you abreast as you keep the church in your prayers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)