About 18 months ago I posted a video detailing the nine ways that one can be an accessory to the mortal sin of another, thereby incurring the guilt of his/her own mortal sin. I now post that and ask you to review, then I'll continue my comments below the video.
I now link to an article by Rob Dreher about the removal of Cardinal McCarrick. He goes into rather graphic detail about the alleged abuses by Cardinal McCarrick. This is not the first time that I've heard of these scenarios. Notice that in this article, McCarrick is depicted as molesting seminarians that were in his charge. McCarrick is removed due to an incident with a minor, but seminarians are not minors. They were young men at the time, but full grown and quite capable of fending off an older man - but they didn't!
As you heard in the video, two of the ways that one shares the guilt of another's mortal sin are by concealment and silence. That's exactly the grievous fault of these young men. A careful read of the article makes clear that some of them pretended not to notice as McCarrick was molesting one of their fellow seminarians a few feet from him. One gets a hint as to the motivation behind the silence - that they didn't want to jeopardize their chances at being ordained. But what really did they do? Did they in fact not compromise their own priesthoods by such (I'll say it) cowardice? In some cases they displayed despicable lack of charity in failing to come to the aid of their brother seminarians. Surely at the time of these incidents they had some knowledge that what was going on was morally repugnant. Would they have looked the other way while a young child was being so raped? Only they can answer that question, but given what they did I shudder to ponder the answer to that question.
This matter is now under investigation. I now call upon those who may have been molested by the Cardinal to come forth and lend their names and testimony to the investigation. They are morally obliged to do so. In their previous silence they not only endangered themselves but the seminarians who came after them under McCarrick's control. They now have the opportunity to make some sort of amends. They now have the opportunity to send messages to other perverts that the days of free access to youths without consequences are over.
The New Normal
33 minutes ago
"The greatest persecution of the church doesn't come from enemies on the outside but is born from the sins within the church." May 11, 2010, Pope Benedict XVIReplyDelete
I additionally Call for any former seminarian and/or now priest or higher rank to come forward for ANY immoral act committed by ANY person in The Church & FINALLY do the right thing especially in their previous silence, rather than waiting to see if SOMEONE comes forward with the truth, hoping they don’t respond to those little notices in the diocesan paper about contacting staff IF one has been abused.
Yes, many "whistleblowers" have had to suffer the consequences when they went to superiors to let them know of the sin of a confrere. They themselves have often been persecuted, marginalized, or drummed out. But it was still the right thing to do and the winking at the sin of the guilty confrere is now a sin on the part of the superior as well.ReplyDelete
And since this involved laity, let's found them all up, fingerprint and background check them, and force them to watch the movie "Pope Francis: A Man of His Word".ReplyDelete
Oh no! Anything but that!Delete