Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Is Francis An Anti-Pope?

We hear from Eugenio Scalfari that Pope Francis has denied Jesus' Divinity while He walked the earth.  Then we hear that the Vatican Press Office tried to wiggle and dance away from the scrutiny the pope's heresy earned.

If you read my link above, you'll recall that several years ago Scalfari was a handy accomplice of the pope.  The pope would make some heretical and/or dissident remark to Scalfari, then the latter would publish it.  Immediately the Vatican would go into "damage control" to imply that what was said wasn't really said.  I suppose it's a rather clever trick, to make a statement to somebody and then to claim that you really didn't say or mean that.  However, this one is getting rather old.

As Michael Voris points out, the Vatican's "denial" really isn't a denial of what was said at all.  They simply are trying to instill doubt in what was plainly reported.  The pope is well aware of this pattern for it has happened quite a few times over the years.  He's making heretical statements and then hides behind Scalfari.  More and more people are waking up to these shenanigans.

Of greater concern is that a pope would even hint at disbelief in the Divinity of Our Lord.  Given his disbelief, who does Pope Francis think he is, as Pope?  The Vicar of ....whom???   Or what???  Given his actions of the past few days, might we conclude that he is the vicar of mother earth?  Because of the magnitude of this heresy, it is becoming apparent that we may be dealing with an anti-pope here.

In addition to praying and fasting, where do we go from here?  What practical measures will we need to take to deal with the fallout from this latest mess?


  1. francis 1st is not now ,and its extremely doubtful has ever has been in the past , a valid pope.
    He is poisoning the church and needs to be removed immediately.

  2. Francis 1 st is not now a pope due to formal heresy publicly manifested on several occasions.
    It is also doubtful he has ever been a pope in the past due to the grave doubts surrounding Pope Benedicts alleged resignation.

  3. If you get a chance, also watch Dr. Marshall and Tim Gordon in their newest podcast on you tube: "Did Pope Francis deny the Divinity of Christ.. The Eugene Scalfari's 2019 interview." I really don't think I have seen Tim Gordon so fired up, well maybe once before. He had fire darts coming out of his eyes! I know it's lengthy but it's worth the watch. According to Tim, this was the worst of the worst from Francis and by the lame statement given by his press office and not making any kind of a public statement himself, it's pretty much a slam dunk that he wanted this info out there. Tim called it the 'Arian Heresy' of Francis. This 'Arianism' is part and parcel of the 'mid 20th Century Jesuit thought. Lots of info I was not aware of...

  4. Did you see that Cardinal Sarah has denounced those who oppose Pope Francis?

    Cardinal Sarah says to oppose the Pope is to be outside the Church.

    “The truth is that the Church is represented on earth by the vicar of Christ, that is by the pope. And whoever is against the pope is, ipso facto, outside the Church,” the cardinal said in an interview published in Corriere della Sera, an Italian daily.

    “Those who place me in opposition to the Holy Father cannot present a single word of mine, a single phrase or a single attitude of mine to support their absurd – and I would say, diabolical – affirmations,” Cardinal Sarah said. “The devil divides, sets people against each other.”

    1. But that begs the question: "Is he a pope?" Do we cease from denouncing error simply because of the error's proponent?

    2. If you do not believe Frances is the pope, you are a seddvacantist. If the succession of popes has been broken, then the Church has ceased to exist, and we no longer have access to the Sacraments, and we will all die in our sins. Satan has won. Checkmate.

    3. Sojourner, you can stop hyperventilating now. What you pronounce about the Church "ceasing to exist" follows no doctrine. There is sufficient doubt that the conclave was valid. Pope Benedict is still alive. I presume that you are going to Mass this Sunday so you certainly have access to the Sacraments. If you're going to accuse me of being a sedevacantist, would you please at least spell the word properly?

  5. Cardinal Sarah is saying that St. Paul was "outside the church" as well as many saints, who protested the popes of their time, starting with St. Peter. Is he saying that, really?? That makes no sense. I've lost respect for these men who have chosen to tout the party line when a strong defense for Christ and the church He created is needed. God will have to raise up saints from out of nowhere because the men we have are woefully inadequate to the task. Party men, all.
    The pope is a demonic apostate. He is not a believer, which he has made clear all along. Has he knelt before Christ in the Blessed Sacrament ONCE? What more do we need to know.

  6. Woe to you schismatics! He is the Jorge. Guy, Texas

  7. Ground zero is Feb 11, 2013. The precise English translation of the Renouncement Declaration should be examined as Msgr. Bux publicly opined in Oct 2018. From what exactly did Pope Benedict resign? Answer: not from the munus--the Papal Office. A conclave should be called provided that the See of Peter (the Office) be empty. The See has been validly occupied since April 2005. Anti-Pope Francis is the wake-up call from Our Lord and Our Lady: a symptom of the virus of Modernism floating about the Church for over a hundred years and injected into the Mystical Body via V-II Council.

  8. Yep. You're correct, Janet. Sojourner is trolling us.


Please be respectful and courteous to others on this blog. We reserve the right to delete comments that violate courtesy and/or those that promote dissent from the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church.