We will listen to the testimony of Kim Fiorentino, an attorney who highlights some violations of the US Constitution First Amendment that are inherent in the Council's attempt to suppress the pro-life pregnancy centers. She points out that the Constituion prohibits viewpoint-coerced speech. She then goes on to state that there is no compelling interest to enact this legislation, as no harmful activity on the part of the pregnancy centers has been demonstrated. I suppose the Councilmembers/"Partners of Choice" have different perspectives, as the pregnancy centers, every time they snatch a mother and child from the clutches of the abortionists, put pains in the purses of the abortionists, and thus in the coffers of NARAL, who undoubtedly receives many a blood-money donation from these abortionists. Please listen to Ms. Fiorentino's testimony here.
We now hear from Ann O'Connor. A little bit earlier, Councilwoman Duchy Trachtenberg, the primary sponsor of this bill (and a former NOW official) made the claim that Rockville Pregnancy Center would be exempt from this regulation, due to its retention of trained medical volunteers. Ms. O'Connor makes plain in her testimony that the language of this regulation still renders RPC vulnerable. Did Ms. O'Connor expose a bit of double-talk? Please form your own opinion as you listen to her testimony here.
The Search for the Historical Trump
5 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful and courteous to others on this blog. We reserve the right to delete comments that violate courtesy and/or those that promote dissent from the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church.