Last April I wrote a piece about how the Obamanista dictators arrogated to themselves authority to ban lunches in Chicago schools - including those packed by parents - for not meeting arbitrary standards of "healthiness". Towards the end I wrote what I thought was a hypothetical farce, and voiced my hope that it was indeed only a farce. To my regret, I learned earlier this week that my so-called farce materialized into reality in North Carolina.
In an elementary school in Raeford, NC, a four-year-old preschooler had her lunch confiscated because it didn't contain the arbitrarily-required vegetable. So what did the poor child eat? They gave her (sit down for this!) chicken nuggets! You know, those deep-fat-fried blobs of chicken meat? Whatever else they are, they certainly aren't vegetables. That is beside the point, but this substitution illustrates either the complete brainlessness of Mrs Messiah's "Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Acts"and signed into law by Mr. Messiah, OR it demonstrates that the control-freaks in the White House are more desirous of glomming power unto itself and to heck with the kids! I tend to think it's more the latter than the former (although we cannot discount altogether bureaucratic stupidity).
This bullying of a four-year-old and the draconian HHS mandates are just two of the latest manifestations of the progressive cabal arrogating power unto itself and trampling our God-given rights and the Consitution in the process. They are getting to be more brazen about it.
Showing posts with label Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act. Show all posts
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Sunday, January 2, 2011
More Thoughts On The Food Police
Look at that video that I posted on Friday with Elmo. Notice the title? "Elmo Doesn't Fear Obama's School Lunch". Odd, isn't it? Perhaps they're telling us more than they realize - the proverbial "Freudian slip", as it were.
First, there's "Elmo doesn't fear". Doesn't it seem like they're trying to quell our instinctive revulsion to interference from On High? This is quite characteristic of any entity that is trying to exert undue force or coercion on another - disarm their natural protective instincts by subtly making the victim feel silly for having reactions of fear - fear that has very real basis. It's a brainwashing, thought-reform technique.
Then there's "Obama's school lunch". Where to begin with that one? Let's just start anywhere.
First, there's "Elmo doesn't fear". Doesn't it seem like they're trying to quell our instinctive revulsion to interference from On High? This is quite characteristic of any entity that is trying to exert undue force or coercion on another - disarm their natural protective instincts by subtly making the victim feel silly for having reactions of fear - fear that has very real basis. It's a brainwashing, thought-reform technique.
Then there's "Obama's school lunch". Where to begin with that one? Let's just start anywhere.
- We have here the bald-faced admission that this attempt at control originated with the Messiah Most Miserable himself. This is his program, and you Great Unwashed better fall in line - right now! Will the lunch trays now bear that "O" symbol on them?
- Obama claims to be the President of the United States. As far as I'm concerned, there is the teensy matter of his birth status that has yet to be resolved, but that's fodder for another post. At any rate, if he is indeed president, then the US Constitution clearly spells out the duties that are within his purview. I've read the Constitution. I've looked up and down, right and left, front and back, and I can see no mention whatsoever of any authority of the President to determine the diets of anyone in the United States. But the video clearly states "Obama's school lunch". The White House produced this thing - courtesy of your tax dollars, hard at work!
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Fat-Police-Nazis Agents Strike In Baltimore
Remember yesterday's post, where I said we'd better watch out for the Fat Police soon to come our way? My bad! They're already here! In October, the Baltimore City Health Department issued its first "environmental citation for repeat violation". The hapless violator is ironically named "Healthy Choice". They've been slapped with a $100 fine and were told that another violation could result in their being shut down.
That's right - shut down! That means years of hard work and life savings put into a venture can go up in smoke because of an artificially-contrived standard that itself is in complete violation of the United States Constitution. What have we come to, in this country? Yet there are a gazillion of these progressive lemmings in what is laughingly referred to as "The Free State" waxing gleeful and self-righteous about this ever-increasing governmental encroachment into our lives.
And, as we see in the previous post, they progressives/socialists, led by their Poster Couple, want more!
Boys and girls, can we all say "Sieg Heil!" ?
That's right - shut down! That means years of hard work and life savings put into a venture can go up in smoke because of an artificially-contrived standard that itself is in complete violation of the United States Constitution. What have we come to, in this country? Yet there are a gazillion of these progressive lemmings in what is laughingly referred to as "The Free State" waxing gleeful and self-righteous about this ever-increasing governmental encroachment into our lives.
And, as we see in the previous post, they progressives/socialists, led by their Poster Couple, want more!
Boys and girls, can we all say "Sieg Heil!" ?
Friday, December 31, 2010
Michelle Obama - "Obese Children...National Security Issue"
A week or so ago, we heard Janet Napolitano tell us that "climate change" is a national security threat. Well, since that fad has died its quick death, we have a new security threat! Are you biting your fingernails yet? Well, here it is, from Mrs Messiah herself! Click here if you can't see embedded video.
She, of course, is talking of the so-called "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act". She claims that obesity is a "national security threat" because supposedly recruits are coming in overweight. Michelle, what else is new? One of the purposes of basic training is to get the recruits in shape. That's how it's always been - that is, until training standards were dumbed down so that women, etc could "pass".
She also claims this bill will "save lives". My, my! She shares her husband's messianic delusions of grandeur. As he looks on, he must be jealous of her since she is obviously not dependent on a teleprompter - but I digress! Now note, on the video, at the 1:40 marker, where she states "we can't just leave it up to the parents". Oh, yes we can. And we accomplish that by getting rid of the structures and bureaucracies that subvert and undermine parental authority and perogative in their children's lives. Do we hear the nanny-socialist state rattling its saber here? Watch out for the "fat police" coming our way!
To further reimforce the nanny state (to propagandize children and those of childish minds), watch this condescending tripe which was produced with your tax dollars! Click here if you can't see embedded video.
You did notice, of course, that there's none of that nasty red meat, right? Well, maybe after that school subverts Elmo's parents and feeds him a politically-correct diet, they can teach him proper language skills so that the poor little thing no longer speaks of himself in the third person.
Before any snide progressives snipe at me for belittling the Obamas' "concern for children", remember that they are both rabidly pro-abortion. Recall all that talk of "future promise" in the first video? Well, what we see now is only 66% of the "promise" that God sent, as 1/3 of unborn children are murdered in their mothers' wombs - murders that the Obamas have worked hard to facilitate!
She, of course, is talking of the so-called "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act". She claims that obesity is a "national security threat" because supposedly recruits are coming in overweight. Michelle, what else is new? One of the purposes of basic training is to get the recruits in shape. That's how it's always been - that is, until training standards were dumbed down so that women, etc could "pass".
She also claims this bill will "save lives". My, my! She shares her husband's messianic delusions of grandeur. As he looks on, he must be jealous of her since she is obviously not dependent on a teleprompter - but I digress! Now note, on the video, at the 1:40 marker, where she states "we can't just leave it up to the parents". Oh, yes we can. And we accomplish that by getting rid of the structures and bureaucracies that subvert and undermine parental authority and perogative in their children's lives. Do we hear the nanny-socialist state rattling its saber here? Watch out for the "fat police" coming our way!
To further reimforce the nanny state (to propagandize children and those of childish minds), watch this condescending tripe which was produced with your tax dollars! Click here if you can't see embedded video.
You did notice, of course, that there's none of that nasty red meat, right? Well, maybe after that school subverts Elmo's parents and feeds him a politically-correct diet, they can teach him proper language skills so that the poor little thing no longer speaks of himself in the third person.
Before any snide progressives snipe at me for belittling the Obamas' "concern for children", remember that they are both rabidly pro-abortion. Recall all that talk of "future promise" in the first video? Well, what we see now is only 66% of the "promise" that God sent, as 1/3 of unborn children are murdered in their mothers' wombs - murders that the Obamas have worked hard to facilitate!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
