Stephen Schneck and others of "katholycs for Obama", please take note! Click here if you can't see embedded video.
Showing posts with label Stephen Schneck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Schneck. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Data-Challenged Theories From Catholic University?
Several weeks ago I posted about the problem of Stephen Schneck at Catholic University. In that post is a video of an interview he gave, spinning some wild yarn claiming that a vote for Obama will reduce abortions.
Jonathan Last of the Weekly Standard attempted to contact Schneck to learn what data supported Schneck's statements. You can read the account for yourselves. Long and short - there is no real data.
So what business does Schneck have in running a department at Catholic University? Looking at the bigger picture of recent events at Catholic University, namely the hiring of John Carr, we can ask what is transpiring at Catholic University in general? It seems to be devolving into a progressive apologists' haven and forum for promoting socialist ideas.
I know there are still voices of sanity on that campus. I implore them to wake up and stop this creeping socialist infestation before it gains more ground there.
Jonathan Last of the Weekly Standard attempted to contact Schneck to learn what data supported Schneck's statements. You can read the account for yourselves. Long and short - there is no real data.
So what business does Schneck have in running a department at Catholic University? Looking at the bigger picture of recent events at Catholic University, namely the hiring of John Carr, we can ask what is transpiring at Catholic University in general? It seems to be devolving into a progressive apologists' haven and forum for promoting socialist ideas.
I know there are still voices of sanity on that campus. I implore them to wake up and stop this creeping socialist infestation before it gains more ground there.
Monday, September 17, 2012
Abortion Is A "Pelvic Issue"!
That precious pearl of wisdom has been bestowed upon us, courtesy of the Catholic University of America. What has gotten into the water cooler inside of the CUA faculty lounge?
On September 12, at Catholic University of America, there was a forum entitled "International Religious Freedom: An Imperative for Peace and the Common Good". If that sounds like a progressive gab-fest, that's because it was. It was jointly sponsored by the USCCB, Catholic Relief Services, CUA and the university's Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies. That tells us a lot right there. We've learned quite a bit about CRS. We've also learned recently that the IPRCS is directed by Stephen Schneck, who just happens to be co-chair of Catholics for Obama.
A CUA faculty member named Maryann Cusimano Love spoke on - you guessed it! - women. Why? Well, according to her, "women are more religious than men" and "attacks on religious freedom affect women more than men". I dunno - but those sound like rather sexist statements to me (by-the-by, I am a woman)! But don't expect her to be called on that blatant sexism by lame-brain-main-stream media, because she's portraying us as victims and that means she's a victim too! Got that?? There I go, digressing again.
Love went on to complain against those who "block" CRS and Caritas (funny how she omitted mention of CARE - but I'm sure it was quite inadvertent! Of course - so stop that snickering!). She does go so far as to acknowledge that some differ with the Church on various issues. Guess what those issues are, according to Love? Why, they're PELVIC ISSUES!
I can only conclude that the brutal murder of babies, the dismembering of tiny unborn children are what Love calls "pelvic issues". I've been on the pro-life front-lines for some time now, and I must say this is a "first". Pelvic issues!!! What euphemisms will these pro-death progressives concoct next?
She then goes on to say that the Church should "make the unexpected choice to reach out to people who are not like us" in "areas where we have common ground". Sorry, dear! There simply is no "common ground" with murder. And yes, we do "reach out" when we practice the Spiritual Works of Mercy, such as rebuking the sinner and instructing the ignorant. It is God and His laws that dictate the proper motives and methods of "reaching out", not an institute directed by someone so fuzzy-headed that he advocates voting for the most pro-baby-murder president ever to occupy the Oval Office.
Two weekends ago I practiced those two Spiritual Works of Mercy when I put my letter in the collection basket in lieu of a donation to CUA. I hope others did the same.
On September 12, at Catholic University of America, there was a forum entitled "International Religious Freedom: An Imperative for Peace and the Common Good". If that sounds like a progressive gab-fest, that's because it was. It was jointly sponsored by the USCCB, Catholic Relief Services, CUA and the university's Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies. That tells us a lot right there. We've learned quite a bit about CRS. We've also learned recently that the IPRCS is directed by Stephen Schneck, who just happens to be co-chair of Catholics for Obama.
A CUA faculty member named Maryann Cusimano Love spoke on - you guessed it! - women. Why? Well, according to her, "women are more religious than men" and "attacks on religious freedom affect women more than men". I dunno - but those sound like rather sexist statements to me (by-the-by, I am a woman)! But don't expect her to be called on that blatant sexism by lame-brain-main-stream media, because she's portraying us as victims and that means she's a victim too! Got that?? There I go, digressing again.
Love went on to complain against those who "block" CRS and Caritas (funny how she omitted mention of CARE - but I'm sure it was quite inadvertent! Of course - so stop that snickering!). She does go so far as to acknowledge that some differ with the Church on various issues. Guess what those issues are, according to Love? Why, they're PELVIC ISSUES!
I can only conclude that the brutal murder of babies, the dismembering of tiny unborn children are what Love calls "pelvic issues". I've been on the pro-life front-lines for some time now, and I must say this is a "first". Pelvic issues!!! What euphemisms will these pro-death progressives concoct next?
She then goes on to say that the Church should "make the unexpected choice to reach out to people who are not like us" in "areas where we have common ground". Sorry, dear! There simply is no "common ground" with murder. And yes, we do "reach out" when we practice the Spiritual Works of Mercy, such as rebuking the sinner and instructing the ignorant. It is God and His laws that dictate the proper motives and methods of "reaching out", not an institute directed by someone so fuzzy-headed that he advocates voting for the most pro-baby-murder president ever to occupy the Oval Office.
Two weekends ago I practiced those two Spiritual Works of Mercy when I put my letter in the collection basket in lieu of a donation to CUA. I hope others did the same.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Stephen Schneck - Key Reason To Boycott Tomorrow's CUA Collection
Stephen Schneck is director of the Institute for Policy Research and Catholics Studies at Catholic University of America. He's also co-chair for Catholics for Obama. Listen to this PBS interview in which he talks about the "complex Catholic vote" as he tries to conjure for dissident "katholycs" some imaginary "wiggle room" to justify a vote for the rabidly pro-abortion and pro-sodomy Barack Hussein Obama.
At about 2:40 he utters nonsense about Obama "championing public policies that address needs of poor, working class, especially as it relates to life issues". Really? How so? If he has in mind the funneling of our tax dollars to Planned Parenthood so that minorities can be duped into murdering their babies, that is not true "championing". He claims that "appeals to Catholics". No, it appeals to katholycs; there IS a difference!
At about 2:40 he utters nonsense about Obama "championing public policies that address needs of poor, working class, especially as it relates to life issues". Really? How so? If he has in mind the funneling of our tax dollars to Planned Parenthood so that minorities can be duped into murdering their babies, that is not true "championing". He claims that "appeals to Catholics". No, it appeals to katholycs; there IS a difference!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
