This is no surprise. To be honest, I anticipated this. Franklin Roosevelt threatened to do this to the Supreme Court when it appeared that they would strike down a goodly part of his unconstitutional "New Deal". Now we have the same thing going on, with more progressives being put in positions to be electors for the next pope. I needn't rehash what others have said. See here and here and here.
Pope Francis is not the first to stack the College of Cardinals. Probably the most recent attempt was by Pope John XXIII as he attempted to preserve the proceedings of Vatican II. This I learned from Taylor Marshall's book "Infiltration". By the way - I'd suggest that everyone get a copy of this book and read it now. It can be obtained on Amazon.
To understand a bit better about this latest crop of cardinals, please take a gander. This post from the heretic Fr James Martin speaks volumes.
Showing posts with label college of cardinals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college of cardinals. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 3, 2019
Sunday, October 9, 2016
Skullduggery In The College Of Cardinals - Sarah Sidelined, Three New Progressives In
Cardinal Robert Sarah is a faithful prelate who did much to oppose the wreckage of the Magisterium that was the purpose of the two sin-nods on the family. This blog and others have been shining the light on theses sin-nods and their resultant mess that is named Amoris Laetitia. I have renamed it Amoralis Lamentia.
It seems that His Eminence is beginning to share some of the fate of Cardinal Burke, another faithful prelate. Cardinal Sarah is currently Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. He had been scheduled to open the academic year for the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family on October 27 in Rome, but the pope basically expelled him from that role, saying he'd do it himself. This comes after the pope apppointed two progressive prelates to head that institute. That institute had also opposed the progressive juggernaut at the two sin-nods.
In August, I wrote about one of those progressive prelates, Archbishop Paglia. His appointment is solid evidence that the pope does indeed intend - as stated in Amoralis Lamentia - to allow divorced Catholics who are living in adultery to commit the mortal sin of sacrilege by receiving Holy Communion without the requisite repentance from mortal sin. In that post, I wrote about another progressive prelate who has done damage to the faith - Bishop Farrell. I will be addressing him in the next paragraph.
The pope just announced that he named 17 new cardinals, to be elevated on November 19th. Three of them are US prelates and one of them is Bishop Farrell. Another is - Archbishop Blaise Cupich of Chicago. Yes, this Cupich! As you can see, he has occasioned a whole series of blog posts with his dissidence and insults to the Faith. Read that anthology and consider the progression of events.
The third US prelate is Archbishop Joseph Tobin of Indianapolis. In January 2015, we learned that a Knight of Columbus council in his diocese rented their hall to lesbians so they could celebrate their sinful relationship. We contacted him to have this debacle stopped; we heard crickets from him. He is not to be confused with Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence RI, who is a faithful prelate.
I just touched upon the three US cardinal-designates. I'd be willing to bet that the fourteen from other countries are just as problematic.
There can be no doubt that the pope is deliberately stacking the College of Cardinals with progressive cronies while marginalizing truly faithful Princes of the Church.
It seems that His Eminence is beginning to share some of the fate of Cardinal Burke, another faithful prelate. Cardinal Sarah is currently Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. He had been scheduled to open the academic year for the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family on October 27 in Rome, but the pope basically expelled him from that role, saying he'd do it himself. This comes after the pope apppointed two progressive prelates to head that institute. That institute had also opposed the progressive juggernaut at the two sin-nods.
In August, I wrote about one of those progressive prelates, Archbishop Paglia. His appointment is solid evidence that the pope does indeed intend - as stated in Amoralis Lamentia - to allow divorced Catholics who are living in adultery to commit the mortal sin of sacrilege by receiving Holy Communion without the requisite repentance from mortal sin. In that post, I wrote about another progressive prelate who has done damage to the faith - Bishop Farrell. I will be addressing him in the next paragraph.
The pope just announced that he named 17 new cardinals, to be elevated on November 19th. Three of them are US prelates and one of them is Bishop Farrell. Another is - Archbishop Blaise Cupich of Chicago. Yes, this Cupich! As you can see, he has occasioned a whole series of blog posts with his dissidence and insults to the Faith. Read that anthology and consider the progression of events.
The third US prelate is Archbishop Joseph Tobin of Indianapolis. In January 2015, we learned that a Knight of Columbus council in his diocese rented their hall to lesbians so they could celebrate their sinful relationship. We contacted him to have this debacle stopped; we heard crickets from him. He is not to be confused with Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence RI, who is a faithful prelate.
I just touched upon the three US cardinal-designates. I'd be willing to bet that the fourteen from other countries are just as problematic.
There can be no doubt that the pope is deliberately stacking the College of Cardinals with progressive cronies while marginalizing truly faithful Princes of the Church.
Monday, March 30, 2015
Cardinal Sins - And Their Papal Enabler
In today's Vortex, Michael Voris clearly lays out the case that many cardinals are deliberately flouting the Church's authority to coddle those in sexual sin or those who profit from sexual sin. Missing from his analysis, though, is a forthright admission of why they are allowed to retain their red hats (what are they called?). More to the point, there is someone who is allowing them to continue their chicanery and perhaps is orchestrating it. I speak, of course, of Pope Francis.
To be fair, many of these cardinals started carrying on when the Pope's predecessors occupied his chair. After last October's sin-nod, though, it became quite clear that this current pontiff at least approves of their dissenting behavior - if he's not outright ordering it. I realize it is the policy of Church Militant TV not to criticize the pope's actions. That's their decision. I and many others hold a different opinion. We will call the spade a spade. I'll now analyze some statements of Voris' and point out some obvious papal connections. I'll go in order as they occur in the video.
To be fair, many of these cardinals started carrying on when the Pope's predecessors occupied his chair. After last October's sin-nod, though, it became quite clear that this current pontiff at least approves of their dissenting behavior - if he's not outright ordering it. I realize it is the policy of Church Militant TV not to criticize the pope's actions. That's their decision. I and many others hold a different opinion. We will call the spade a spade. I'll now analyze some statements of Voris' and point out some obvious papal connections. I'll go in order as they occur in the video.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
