In mid-October of 2017, Leroy Carhart resumed his butchering of babies in the wombs of their mothers. Operation Rescue learned a few days ago that one scant month after setting up shop in Bethesda, he also resumed sending women to the hospital via ambulance.
There are two things that should be mentioned. First, the other tenants in that building better get used to seeing ambulances pull up on a regular basis as happened in Germantown. Their patients and clients will be treated to the sight of badly injured - maybe even dying women - being hauled away. There will be the sight of blood and smell of vomit in the hallways. Why will these other tenants - themselves payers of rent - have to put up with this? More importantly, many of them are also medical professionals. How can their professional consciences not be outraged by the obvious incompetence displayed by Carhart? How can they countenance baby-slaughter?
Second, the OR piece mentions that an NIH ambulance took the woman to Walter Reed Army Medical Hospital. I've lived in Montgomery County most of my life whereas the OR author didn't so I notice some things that she may not have. Why did they summon an ambulance from NIH when the fire department at the corner of Old Georgetown and Cedar Lane was much closer? Why did they haul the woman all the way to Walter Reed when Suburban Hospital was just a few miles south on Old Georgetown? The OR piece raises the possibility of improper use of federal funds for this transport. Moreover, if a woman is hemorrhaging, speed and efficiency are of the essence. They did not happen in November 2017. I agree that much stinks about such an arrangement.
We will bring you news of any other episodes. They will happen - and some may have already occurred between November and today.
Thought For The Day
2 hours ago
I am totally opposed to abortion, but if a woman cannot be convinced not to have an abortion I think she should go to a hospital rather than a clinic because she has a greater chance of surviving an emergency situation if she is already in the hospital when the emergency occurs.
ReplyDeleteTo provide that as an option would constitute cooperation with mortal sin. We cannot do evil even for a well-intentioned end.
Delete
DeleteExplanation of Formal and Material Cooperation in evil and abortion
ihttps://moleski.net/cac/Formal_and_Material_Cooperation_in_Evil#Examples_of_cooperation_in_abortion
At our killing center about a month ago, a Sheriff's vehicle brought a woman in who was in the jumpsuit and chains! Not only that but this was the Sheriff's department from a county 60 miles away!! What gives there?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDid you mean to say that a hospital should be allowed to abort a baby? If not, what would be the point of her going to a hospital?
DeleteWhat kind of human being do this to little babies? Only a Satanical one.
ReplyDeleteI think abortion should not be legal which was the case when I became an RN in 1968 at he age of 23. I then witnessed many miscarriages some suspected of having been induced, which was illegal abortion at that time. I met many people with varying beliefs about abortion even in Catholic hospitals. Some cannot be convinced that abortion is wrong in all cases, and after trying our best to save both mother and baby, I think the least one can do from a ethical point of view is to inform the mother of the risk factors of experiencing a life-threatening or fatal outcome herself in a clinic facility as apposed to a hospital. I do not see this as cooperating or condoning abortion in any way, as I have said, all attempts to convince the mother not to undergo abortion in this hypothetical situation have failed. I would consider it a duty to try then to preserve her health and life as best I could by informing her of the increased risk factor in a clinic as opposed to a hospital. I would not go with her or provide transportation or any assistance in carrying out her plan.
ReplyDeleteBetter off with abortions being as dangerous as possible. It'd scare off some people and if the rest are too depraved or stupid to go ahead with it, they deserve what they get.
ReplyDelete