Seamless Garbage Pollutes The March For Life

The progressives are working overtime to insinuate "seamless garment" poison into the pro-life movement.  For accuracy, I'll refer to it as "seamless garbage" for that is a more accurate descriptor.  It made its way even to the rally stage of the March for Life.  C-Span has video of the entire rally, with all the speakers.  At about the 5:40 mark, you can hear an Orthodox bishop incorrectly claim that immigration concerns and the death penalty are just as evil as is abortion.  Not to be outdone by the Orthodox, DC Cardinal Wuerl spouts essentially the same nonsense in his blog as he carries on about those without insurance, illegal aliens immigrants, etc.

One Peter Five has done research that corroborates the fact that the USCCB's motives behind their eagerness for refugees is not completely altruistic.  Nope!  The USCCB receives at least several hundreds of millions of dollars (if not billion) from the feds (ultimately from our tax dollars) to "resettle" the illegals.  We might assume that non-Catholics are receiving similar grants: hence the "seamless garbage" crowing by the Orthodox bishop at the March.  Over the years, the USCCB has shown itself to be particularly susceptible to the seductive scent of dollar bills.

The Lepanto Institute has uncovered an even more troubling lapse of morals on the part of the USCCB in favor of - you guessed it! - MONEY!  They are lobbying Congress to fund two organizations that funnel money to Planned Parenthood and other death-dealing organizations because they in turn receive money from them.  This USCCB letter sounds so lofty and noble, right?  The letter's language shows the infestation of seamless garbage as abortion is completely ignored while other issues are exalted in its place.

Yesterday LifeSiteNews published a piece by Doug Mainwaring detailing another facet of "seamless garbage" adulteration of the pro-life movement.  That is, gays are trying to align themselves with us.  While I think it laudable on one hand that they see the evil of baby-slaughter, they also attempt to justify their mortal sins of sexual perversion via their abortion opposition.  They fail - or refuse - to acknowledge that abortion and sodomy stem from the same rejection of God's plan for life, family, sexuality, marriage.  Doug made mention of Rosemary Geraghty.  I too warned about her in an earlier post.  She is on the board of the "seamless garbage" Rehumanize International.

We as Catholics must stand for God's plan for marriage, family, sexuality, life.  God has privileged us with the ability to procreate new life with His grace.  The devil hates us for that because by that privilege we help engender new people to potentially enjoy life with God in eternity.  Hence all direct attacks against that privilege must be given top priority and we must allow nothing - be that diversion ever so noble - to dilute our energies from establishing the Culture of Life.  The diabolical attacks are: contraception, abortion, euthanasia, abuse of embryos, attacks on marriage (including divorce), the furtherance of homosexual perversions.  Let's engage in a laser-like focus on these matters and leave the "seamless garbage" in the trash where it belongs.

Some Background On The Gay Infestation Occurring Today

ChurchMilitant.TV has produced another documentary, this time giving an overview of how sexual perversions insinuated themselves into mainstream culture today.  It's over an hour, but I think well worth the time to watch.  Please spread the word.

Goodbye To Starbucks

Actually I cannot say that, but only because I never developed a taste for coffee.  That said, I'm suggesting that my coffee-drinking friends seriously consider eschewing Starbucks.  Its CEO Howard Schultz poo-pooed a suggestion by an investor that the conglomerate's support of sodomy is hurting the business.  While he acknowledged that their numbers weren't up to snuff, Schultz indicated that he didn't care; Starbucks would continue to support perversion.

I'll say this much for Schultz; he can't be accused of "double-speak".  BUT, if he doesn't care about receiving our money and our business, then we might as well take it elsewhere.  There's no need for us to waste our money there, as a portion of it will undoubtedly be used to undermine our core principles.  While I'm sure the coffee is decent, I also understand it's overpriced.  Get your coffee elsewhere and at a more reasonable price.  Then donate the difference to National Organization for Marriage.  As I said, I wish I could say I'm boycotting Starbucks but I never bought there anyway.

Alternative idea!  Consider coffee from Mystic Monks!

Thank You, Monsignor Charles Pope!!

Monsignor Charles Pope, a priest of the Archdiocese of Washington, openly decried the silence of the Church regarding the sin of homosexual activity; his article appeared on the diocesan blog.  He also stated the Biblical principles underlying the Church's teaching, making clear that such activity is a sin in the eyes of God and can never be condoned.

I for one thank Msgr Pope for speaking out on such matters, as a priest is called to do.  If we have any reason to believe that repurcussions are visited upon him for doing so (like being shipped to "diocesan Siberias", as has happened to others), be advised that we will blow the lid off that in a hurry.

Father Rodriguez - Thrown Under The Bus

On August 4th, I reported about a priest, Father Rodriguez of El Paso Texas who wrote clearly about a Catholic's duty to oppose abortion.  Someone commented that he hoped his bishop wouldn't try to "silence" him.  Sadly and outrageously, this is precisely what is now happening to Father.

Bishop Armando Ochoa of El Paso has rebuked him publicly.  Read the bishop's column in the El Paso Times.   I'll pick apart the bishop's column just a little, because it is chock-full of moral equivalancy.  One plumb example is, "When we talk about abortion and homosexuality, we are talking about human beings dealing with all kinds of concerns and unresolved challenges."  When His Excellency "talks about human beings", is he thinking, even for one split second, about the tiniest of human beings whose overwhelming concern is whether they'll be allowed to draw the breath of life or be violently ripped to shreds in their mothers' wombs as they're aborted?  I suspect not, to be frank.

Republicans Need to Clean House!

They need to start at the top - the very top.  A month or two ago, I blogged about the strip club jaunts being financed by the RNC.  Now it seems that Michael Steele thinks that being homosexual is on the same par as being black.  Now we read from Americans for Truth About Homosexuality that Steele will not meet with representatives from Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays.  Why not?  Of what is he afraid?

The upper eschelons of the Republican Party had damned well better realize that conservatives, particularly Christian pro-life and pro-family conservatives, can no longer be taken for granted.  Have they not been paying attention to the Tea Party movement?

More on Gay Prostitution Ring in the Vatican

According to this Lifesite news article, two Vatican officials have been removed since one was caught procuring male prostitutes for the other.  Please read the article.

Like the dandelion flower is just the above-ground manifestation of a pernicious weed in the garden, so too are these two men.  Pray that the ongoing investigation may root out this poison from the Vatican.  Chances are that as this "weed" is traced, many in high places will likewise be removed.  May God purify His Church this Lent - in every way!

Notre Dame Newspaper Rejects Column by Charles Rice

I read from my friend at Les Femmes that Dr. Charles Rice, renowned for his fidelity to the Church and who has for some time written a regular column for The Observer (campus newspaper)  had his column rejected because he presented correctly the Church's teaching on homosexuality.  The Les Femmes article has all relevant contact information.  I wrote to the editor.  Because I highly suspect that my letter won't be printed in that paper, I reproduce it below:

"Mr. Gamber, I read the correspondence between you and Dr. Rice regarding your rejection of his article. Need I remind you, sir, that you edit a Catholic newspaper? Accordingly, you are solemnly charged with presenting the teaching of the Magisterium as such. It is not just a "viewpoint"; it represents God's will with regards to the topic of the disorder known as homosexuality. Apparently the liberal powers-that-be do not consider Holy Mother Church to be politically correct - but so what? You, as the editor of a Catholic newspaper, are charged with presenting Church teaching, not with spouting politically correct pabulum. If that is disagreeable to you, perhaps you should resign as editor. Thank you."

I then advised him that the letter is reproduced here. Please write your own.