In the most recent issue of Crisis magazine, we see an article entitled, "Is The Youth Synod's Final Document Already Written?" I've got to assume that this question is merely rhetorical, for given the Vatican's behavior with the family sin-nod (the one that produced Amoralis Lamentia) we knew from the get-go that it was probably written long before the first attendees landed at the local airport.
We got a hint of that when Book Thief Baldy lied about the letters "LGBT" being included in a pre-synod document. They weren't but he thought it was a handy excuse to include them in the Instrumentum Laboris. When called on his lie, he just shrugged his shoulders and said that the acronym would remain. With that he also confirmed the suspicions of many faithful Catholics - that this gabfest is all about trying to make sodomy seem acceptable to the gullible Catholic in the pews.
It's worth pointing out here that one of the sin-nod's discussion groups took the occasion to trash-talk Catholic home schooling. Folks, let's cut to the chase. The progressives in the Church fear home schooling for they know that home-schooled children stand an excellent chance of learning the authentic Catholic faith. These young people will then be able to see through their lies and shams and reject them for what they are. Of course those lies include the acceptance of the mortal sins of sodomy and other related perversions.
The Vortex's take on the matter....
Saturday, October 20, 2018
Friday, October 19, 2018
Keep Cardinal "Nighty-Night-Baby" Tobin OUT Of The Archdiocese Of Washington
From the Remnant we hear news that the dissident Cardinal Joseph Tobin is being seriously considered as a successor to Cardinal Wuerl. We have had enough of dissident prelates. Please join this effort by signing the petition and by passing this on to your families and friends, particularly if they live within the Archdiocese of Washington.
So Much For Accompanying In The San Diego Diocese!
Bishop McElroy of the Diocese of San Diego has hosted "listening sessions" for the benefit of those Catholics in his diocese who are troubled by the sex scandals. Well, for the benefit of some Catholics. McElroy has evicted several faithful who have brought up failings of McElroy himself - including the retention of a sodomite in prominent positions who lives in gay #mowwidge.
Church Militant has obtained footage of one such ejection and has exposed another. Lepanto Institute recorded the ejection of a woman who rebuked the retention of a sodomite as a diocesan employee. The latter caused McElroy to go into a royal hissy fit as he had her forcibly ejected.
The Lepanto piece delved more into the background of Aaron Bianco, the sodomite occupying several positions of influence. Lepanto pointed out his address: an address that is available to anyone who googles his name. I tried it myself and here's the link.
Father James Martin, infamous dissident, is one not to let a good crisis go to waste. Get a load of his tweet. He did relate some good news: that Bianco resigned. In reality, Bianco should have been fired long before this. Notice how Martin intimates that Lepanto and LifeSiteNews hunted down Bianco's address and maliciously published it? Again, I myself found it in 20 seconds just by googling his name. Martin also tried to implicate Church Militant with responsibility for the church vandalism: something for which he has absolutely no proof. Here's the link to his tweet. Please open the entire thread. See how he tries to ascribe responsibility for the tire-slashing to Church Militant? Teensy problem for Martin: the tire-slashing happened last year, before this expose. CM has replied that Martin may find himself with a defamation suit on his hands. I for one hope CM goes for it.
Martin also calls for the "reporting" of faithful Catholics who rebuke those in mortal sin. He is of the same nazi-esque mindset as McElroy, who gives faithful Catholics the heave-ho from his "listening sessions". Only dissidents and/or perverts are to be accompanied. Maybe that's just as well because I for one would not want to accompany them on their current hell-ward direction.
Church Militant has obtained footage of one such ejection and has exposed another. Lepanto Institute recorded the ejection of a woman who rebuked the retention of a sodomite as a diocesan employee. The latter caused McElroy to go into a royal hissy fit as he had her forcibly ejected.
The Lepanto piece delved more into the background of Aaron Bianco, the sodomite occupying several positions of influence. Lepanto pointed out his address: an address that is available to anyone who googles his name. I tried it myself and here's the link.Father James Martin, infamous dissident, is one not to let a good crisis go to waste. Get a load of his tweet. He did relate some good news: that Bianco resigned. In reality, Bianco should have been fired long before this. Notice how Martin intimates that Lepanto and LifeSiteNews hunted down Bianco's address and maliciously published it? Again, I myself found it in 20 seconds just by googling his name. Martin also tried to implicate Church Militant with responsibility for the church vandalism: something for which he has absolutely no proof. Here's the link to his tweet. Please open the entire thread. See how he tries to ascribe responsibility for the tire-slashing to Church Militant? Teensy problem for Martin: the tire-slashing happened last year, before this expose. CM has replied that Martin may find himself with a defamation suit on his hands. I for one hope CM goes for it.
Martin also calls for the "reporting" of faithful Catholics who rebuke those in mortal sin. He is of the same nazi-esque mindset as McElroy, who gives faithful Catholics the heave-ho from his "listening sessions". Only dissidents and/or perverts are to be accompanied. Maybe that's just as well because I for one would not want to accompany them on their current hell-ward direction.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Yet Another Reason To Curtail In-Pew Donations In Washington - And Federal Investigations Commence!
As if the $50k-per-month retainer arrangement wasn't enough, we now learn that the Archdiocese of Washington paid CNN to run ads that extol the supposed "accomplishments" of Cardinal Wuerl. Now what does it really mean when we say "Archdiocese of Washington paid"? It means, fellow Catholics of the Archdiocese of Washington, that the funds for this image-rehabilitation futility came from our donation dollars. Well, not mine since I made the corrections not to allow my donation dollars to be funneled to diocesan bank accounts.
The hubris and self aggrandizement of Wuerl is an outrage. Does he really believe that we are so stupid as to fall for that codswallop hook-line-and-sinker? I regret that some still persist in stubborn denial, but more and more are having the scales fall from their eyes.
Speaking of expenses, one might wonder if Cardinal Wuerl might be dismissing the Jones Day law firm, the one to which the archdiocese was paying a monthly retainer of $50k to cover the Cardinal's, uh.., "hind regions". I wouldn't bet on that. Federal investigators are launching their own probes into the allegations broached by the state of Pennsylvania. Once again, that means that both Wuerl and McCarrick are directly implicated. If I was one of the investigators, I'd see to it that Wuerl's and McCarrick's passports were immediately revoked. By the way - in addition to being alarmingly close to schools, McCarrick's penitential hideaway is also close to an airport? Don't the hierarchical wolves think of everything?
Let the investigations commence. Keep your prayers coming, but stop the dollar flow.
The hubris and self aggrandizement of Wuerl is an outrage. Does he really believe that we are so stupid as to fall for that codswallop hook-line-and-sinker? I regret that some still persist in stubborn denial, but more and more are having the scales fall from their eyes.
Speaking of expenses, one might wonder if Cardinal Wuerl might be dismissing the Jones Day law firm, the one to which the archdiocese was paying a monthly retainer of $50k to cover the Cardinal's, uh.., "hind regions". I wouldn't bet on that. Federal investigators are launching their own probes into the allegations broached by the state of Pennsylvania. Once again, that means that both Wuerl and McCarrick are directly implicated. If I was one of the investigators, I'd see to it that Wuerl's and McCarrick's passports were immediately revoked. By the way - in addition to being alarmingly close to schools, McCarrick's penitential hideaway is also close to an airport? Don't the hierarchical wolves think of everything?
Let the investigations commence. Keep your prayers coming, but stop the dollar flow.
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Sin-Nod On How To Spiritually Murder Our Youth
This so-called "youth synod", more accurately a sin-nod, is showing how literally hell-bent some of our prelates are to brainwash young people (and anyone else) into normalizing the mortal sins of homosexual conduct. They are becoming more and more brazen about it.
The first ominous signs appeared in the sin-nod's Instrumentum Laboris; I touched on just a few of them here. Archbishop Chaput pointed out another glaring fault when he noticed the phrase "LGBT youths" in paragraph 197 of the document. He rightly stated that it is inherently unhealthy for Catholics to define themselves according to sexuality. I'd add that it is doubly dangerous to define oneself in terms of inherently disordered traits. What might one say to someone who claims to be a "murderous Catholic"? Most of us would do a double-take, I daresay. When LifeSiteNews called out "Bookthief Baldy" on the matter, he tried to claim that the phrase came from a pre-synodal document composed by young people. LifeSiteNews called him out on the lie (politely, of course). In other words, Baldy et al inserted that phrase themselves, pretending that they were "listening to and accompanying" the young people.
One of the small groups took up the mantle of gay-shilling, led by Cardinal Maradiaga. In addition to being another flagrant progressive, he is also de facto leader of the "gang of nine" AND embroiled in some homosexual scandals of his own in Honduras. They want the Church to "pay more attention to homosexuals" and the "realities they face", such as "marriage and surrogate pregnancy". This group makes no mention whatsoever of the reality of eternal damnation that looms on the horizon for any practicing sodomite who doesn't repent and make a good confession before he or she dies and is called to his/her particular judgment.
We also heard from a "youth delegate" from Chile who claims to have listened to Catholic and non-Christian youth. Using the excuse that she heard more from the non-Christians, she completely omitted the input that she received from Catholic youth, as though they should have no voice at all. The woman's name is Silvia Teresa Morales. She claims that homosexuals "live their faith within the church". Big problem! If people are defining themselves as homosexuals (or racists, or murderers, etc), they most likely are giving way to their disordered drives. Therefore, they are NOT living their faith. They have the same rights as all Catholics: to repent of their sins, confess their sins. No one has the "right" to flaunt their mortal sins and thumb their noses at God Himself.
Some voices of sanity and decency still remain in the Church hierarchy. In addition to Archbishop Chaput, Cardinal Sarah spoke out, stating quite plainly that the watering down of Church teaching will not attract young people (or older ones, for that matter). He said correctly that they want clarity
But wait a minute! It appears that the pope is once again railing at those of us who do hold onto the crystal-clear teachings of Jesus Christ and refuse to let them be obscured by all this "accompanying" jibber-jabber. Yesterday during his Mass he lambasted us "rigid" Christians. Again, this is talk specifically designed to shut us up. One of the sin-nod's small groups took a swipe at Catholic parents who home-school their children. They fear that these parents might have an "ideological basis". Well, if they mean that the parents intend to pass on the unadulterated Faith to their children, as they are called by God to do so, maybe that can be called "ideological" but that is by no means to be interpreted in a pejorative manner.
So it appears that this youth sin-nod does have a theme, doesn't it? It's about contradicting the clear commands of Our Lord with regards to homosexuality, affirming perverts in their mortal sins and making it more likely they'll find themselves in hell. Why else would the pope wear this? He's both promoting the gay ideology and profaning the Cross of Jesus Christ. Please continue with your rosaries by all means.
The first ominous signs appeared in the sin-nod's Instrumentum Laboris; I touched on just a few of them here. Archbishop Chaput pointed out another glaring fault when he noticed the phrase "LGBT youths" in paragraph 197 of the document. He rightly stated that it is inherently unhealthy for Catholics to define themselves according to sexuality. I'd add that it is doubly dangerous to define oneself in terms of inherently disordered traits. What might one say to someone who claims to be a "murderous Catholic"? Most of us would do a double-take, I daresay. When LifeSiteNews called out "Bookthief Baldy" on the matter, he tried to claim that the phrase came from a pre-synodal document composed by young people. LifeSiteNews called him out on the lie (politely, of course). In other words, Baldy et al inserted that phrase themselves, pretending that they were "listening to and accompanying" the young people.
One of the small groups took up the mantle of gay-shilling, led by Cardinal Maradiaga. In addition to being another flagrant progressive, he is also de facto leader of the "gang of nine" AND embroiled in some homosexual scandals of his own in Honduras. They want the Church to "pay more attention to homosexuals" and the "realities they face", such as "marriage and surrogate pregnancy". This group makes no mention whatsoever of the reality of eternal damnation that looms on the horizon for any practicing sodomite who doesn't repent and make a good confession before he or she dies and is called to his/her particular judgment.
We also heard from a "youth delegate" from Chile who claims to have listened to Catholic and non-Christian youth. Using the excuse that she heard more from the non-Christians, she completely omitted the input that she received from Catholic youth, as though they should have no voice at all. The woman's name is Silvia Teresa Morales. She claims that homosexuals "live their faith within the church". Big problem! If people are defining themselves as homosexuals (or racists, or murderers, etc), they most likely are giving way to their disordered drives. Therefore, they are NOT living their faith. They have the same rights as all Catholics: to repent of their sins, confess their sins. No one has the "right" to flaunt their mortal sins and thumb their noses at God Himself.
Some voices of sanity and decency still remain in the Church hierarchy. In addition to Archbishop Chaput, Cardinal Sarah spoke out, stating quite plainly that the watering down of Church teaching will not attract young people (or older ones, for that matter). He said correctly that they want clarity
But wait a minute! It appears that the pope is once again railing at those of us who do hold onto the crystal-clear teachings of Jesus Christ and refuse to let them be obscured by all this "accompanying" jibber-jabber. Yesterday during his Mass he lambasted us "rigid" Christians. Again, this is talk specifically designed to shut us up. One of the sin-nod's small groups took a swipe at Catholic parents who home-school their children. They fear that these parents might have an "ideological basis". Well, if they mean that the parents intend to pass on the unadulterated Faith to their children, as they are called by God to do so, maybe that can be called "ideological" but that is by no means to be interpreted in a pejorative manner.
So it appears that this youth sin-nod does have a theme, doesn't it? It's about contradicting the clear commands of Our Lord with regards to homosexuality, affirming perverts in their mortal sins and making it more likely they'll find themselves in hell. Why else would the pope wear this? He's both promoting the gay ideology and profaning the Cross of Jesus Christ. Please continue with your rosaries by all means.
Sunday, October 14, 2018
Pope Francis, Do NOT Appoint Another Dissident To The Archdiocese Of Washington!
As announced a few days ago, the pope has (finally!) accepted the resignation of Cardinal Wuerl as Archbishop of Washington. The pope stipulated that Wuerl is to retain authority as "apostolic administrator" until a successor is selected. We may rest assured that Wuerl will have huge input (if not sole input) regarding that selection. However long it takes, Wuerl will be in charge; that is, he's gone in name only.
The rumor mill has floated some names, none of which are outside the realm of possibilities, given the mindsets of both Wuerl and the pope. Some of these give great cause for concern, as I have written when the "possibilities" have made their problematic characteristics known. They are:
The rumor mill has floated some names, none of which are outside the realm of possibilities, given the mindsets of both Wuerl and the pope. Some of these give great cause for concern, as I have written when the "possibilities" have made their problematic characteristics known. They are:
- Cardinal Joseph "nighty-night baby" Tobin He allowed lesbians to celebrate their perversion of #mowwidge in a KofC hall. He allowed gay "pilgirmages" in his diocese. He poo-pooed the concerns of the Dubia Cardinals. He is not to be confused with Bishop Thomas Tobin of Rhode Island.
- Bishop Robert McElroy - In his opposition to President Trump, he wrote that "we must all become disrupters"; might he hold some blame for all the antifa crap going on now? We faithful Catholics who expose him, on the other hand, are called "cancers" engaging in "verbal violence". He ordered his priests to give Holy Communion to adulterous Catholics.
- Cardinal Blaise Cupich - his appointment here would be the stuff of nightmares. He has persecuted faithful priests such as Fathers Frank Phillips and Paul Kalchik. He is a shill for the giving of Holy Communion to adulterers and sodomites. He allows dissidents like Father Michael Pfleger to run rampant. Church Militant put up a petition that he be removed - and now he might come here? Puh-leeezeee!
I and many faithful Catholic bloggers have taken these prelates (and others) to task. To the trolls who have been charged by the Vatican to follow our blogs, please be advised that if any of these (or other dissidents) are assigned to the Washington Archdiocese, we will rebuke them when necessary (perhaps that might be its own full-time job). We will shine the light on any misdeeds.
We of the Archdiocese of Washington have already put up with two dissident prelates and have seen good priests here both hog-tied and/or expelled. Be advised that we will not be silent. We will take a page from Pope Francis' playbook and make a mess for those who would turn the mystical body of Christ into just another social-justice, community-organizing progressive racket.
Rest assured we will be watching and we won't hesitate to raise our voices and withhold our dollars if we perceive the next bishop to be one who will continue with the desecration of Holy Mother Church. To the progressive Vatican officials who even now ponder their choices, if you do select another progressive, well, to borrow a phrase of Cardinal Cupich, do you really want to go down that rabbit hole?
Friday, October 12, 2018
More Vomit From The Youth Sin-Nod
What else can be expected when it starts off with the pope carrying a wiccan stang into the opening Mass? I just started to glance at the Instrumentum Laboris and that promises to be a stinker, too.
At this thing, the attendees were put into fourteen groups for discussion, all led by prelates. Cardinal Cupich led one, Cardinal Maradiaga another. Right there you can see the rigging in the works. Cupich's group allegedly called for "recognition of other forms of family". Stop right there. A family comes about when a biologically born man and a biologically born woman enter into matrimony and beget/raise children. Not two men, not two women, not self-mutilated people or any other permutation, pretenses and delusions notwithstanding. So why might I think that Cupich might have forced that conclusion? Well, let's examine the following facts about his Archdiocese of Chicago.
Father Rigoberto Gamez of St Aloysius parish has recently been charged with several instances of sexual battery. He is now ordered to wear a monitoring bracelet. Currently he is Associate Vicar for Canonical Affairs for the Chicago archdiocese. Will he retain that position and his parish assignment?
Father Michael Guimon of the Friars Servants of Mary is head of the priory at Our Lady of Sorrows National Basilica in Chicago. Within that priory he hosts what are essentially gay hook-up meetings and he is a "gay masseur". In other words, he has turned the basilica into a sodomite orgy den, profaning that sacred place with filthy abominations.
Will Cupich laicize these two? Who knows? We do know he has the long knives out for Father Kalchik who is still in hiding lest he be dragged to St Luke's because his parishioners burned a gay flag. This is the sort of prelate who has been given a key role in this sin-nod.
I post now a video from Remnant TV showing a rather raucous performance by young people, with prelates obviously enjoying it. One commenter wrote that he noticed just how much the bishops were enjoying seeing young men gyrate and prance about. Sadly he's probably correct. See for yourselves and keep praying.
At this thing, the attendees were put into fourteen groups for discussion, all led by prelates. Cardinal Cupich led one, Cardinal Maradiaga another. Right there you can see the rigging in the works. Cupich's group allegedly called for "recognition of other forms of family". Stop right there. A family comes about when a biologically born man and a biologically born woman enter into matrimony and beget/raise children. Not two men, not two women, not self-mutilated people or any other permutation, pretenses and delusions notwithstanding. So why might I think that Cupich might have forced that conclusion? Well, let's examine the following facts about his Archdiocese of Chicago.
Father Rigoberto Gamez of St Aloysius parish has recently been charged with several instances of sexual battery. He is now ordered to wear a monitoring bracelet. Currently he is Associate Vicar for Canonical Affairs for the Chicago archdiocese. Will he retain that position and his parish assignment?
Father Michael Guimon of the Friars Servants of Mary is head of the priory at Our Lady of Sorrows National Basilica in Chicago. Within that priory he hosts what are essentially gay hook-up meetings and he is a "gay masseur". In other words, he has turned the basilica into a sodomite orgy den, profaning that sacred place with filthy abominations.
Will Cupich laicize these two? Who knows? We do know he has the long knives out for Father Kalchik who is still in hiding lest he be dragged to St Luke's because his parishioners burned a gay flag. This is the sort of prelate who has been given a key role in this sin-nod.
I post now a video from Remnant TV showing a rather raucous performance by young people, with prelates obviously enjoying it. One commenter wrote that he noticed just how much the bishops were enjoying seeing young men gyrate and prance about. Sadly he's probably correct. See for yourselves and keep praying.
Pope Francis Accepts Wuerl's Resignation As DC Archbishop
I certainly was delighted to see that news this morning. By the way - isn't it just the strangest of coincidences that news like this often breaks on Fridays? It's like some people hope that the weekend will help dissipate interest in the topic at large, right? But I digress.
But as I pondered the pope's request that Wuerl remain as an interim administrator in DC until a successor is named and installed, my jubilation was tempered somewhat. Just how long will this selection process take? Is this "resignation acceptance" thing just a ploy to allow Wuerl to retain all his authority and influence while pretending that he really isn't doing that? Speaking of authority, Wuerl will still retain his position at the College for Bishops. I'd also be willing to bet that he'll have significant input, if not sole discretion, in the selection of his successor.
The CM link has the full text of the pope's letter in which he accepts Wuerl's resignation. As you read it, please have some peptol bismol at the ready and try not to punch your computer screens. His praise of Wuerl is over the top, yapping and yammering about his "heart of the shepherd" and "nobility". Oh, puleeze! Get real! Oh, wait a minute! What can we expect? In many ways the pope and Wuerl are two peas from the same pod.
Another pea from that same pod is Father Rosica - yes, this one! After the news broke, he let loose with a tweet praising Wuerl, saying "he touched us". One might wonder just where was he touched? Given the fact that Wuerl is suffering the just desserts of having covered for McCarrick and other predators, we can only state that Rosica's choice of words was oafish and boorish at best. Or perhaps it was quite the Freudian slip.
Catholics in the DC archdiocese, please be alert as to how this news is handled at Mass this Sunday. Share your reactions in the comment boxes if you'd like. We will all keep praying our Rosaries, as many more clerical dissidents and predators need to be removed.
But as I pondered the pope's request that Wuerl remain as an interim administrator in DC until a successor is named and installed, my jubilation was tempered somewhat. Just how long will this selection process take? Is this "resignation acceptance" thing just a ploy to allow Wuerl to retain all his authority and influence while pretending that he really isn't doing that? Speaking of authority, Wuerl will still retain his position at the College for Bishops. I'd also be willing to bet that he'll have significant input, if not sole discretion, in the selection of his successor.
The CM link has the full text of the pope's letter in which he accepts Wuerl's resignation. As you read it, please have some peptol bismol at the ready and try not to punch your computer screens. His praise of Wuerl is over the top, yapping and yammering about his "heart of the shepherd" and "nobility". Oh, puleeze! Get real! Oh, wait a minute! What can we expect? In many ways the pope and Wuerl are two peas from the same pod.
Another pea from that same pod is Father Rosica - yes, this one! After the news broke, he let loose with a tweet praising Wuerl, saying "he touched us". One might wonder just where was he touched? Given the fact that Wuerl is suffering the just desserts of having covered for McCarrick and other predators, we can only state that Rosica's choice of words was oafish and boorish at best. Or perhaps it was quite the Freudian slip.
Catholics in the DC archdiocese, please be alert as to how this news is handled at Mass this Sunday. Share your reactions in the comment boxes if you'd like. We will all keep praying our Rosaries, as many more clerical dissidents and predators need to be removed.
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Corruption Is Shedding Its Disguises
More and more we are seeing corroboration of the words of St. John Chrysotom: "The road to hell is paved with the bones of priests and monks, and the skulls of bishops are the lamp posts that light the path."
Archbishop Mark Coleridge of the Archdiocese of Brisbane (Austrilia) tweeted a few days ago as a reply to Jesus being "consultant or king", that "not too sure that I want or have him as either". It sure sounds like apostasy to me. I found it rather hard to believe, but unless his twitter account was hacked, the evidence is there to see. I found the exchange on twitter and post it below. Click the tweet to see Coleridge's reply.
As you can see from the comments, several people have asked him for clarification and have received no response. I myself just posted an email to the diocesan website and encourage all to do the same. If we just reply to the tweet and his account is indeed hacked, he'll never get the message. If, however, I fail to receive any reply to my inquiry, well, that indeed will be a reply.
During a recent interview, Cardinal Cupich said it's "not our policy" to deny Holy Communion to those in sodomite #mowwidge. In other words, it's his policy to thumb his nose at Canon law and the Tradition of the Church. It's also his policy to persecute faithful priests in his diocese, such as Fathers Paul Kalchik and Frank Phillips. Speaking of faithful priests in the Chicago area, Cupich was asked in that same interview about Bishop Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield, a suffragan diocese of the Chicago metropolitan. Paprocki made clear that his diocese would obey Canon 915. We can imagine that Cupich is already doing all in his power to make Paprocki's life as miserable as possible.
Please recall that last summer a drug-and-sodomy orgy was busted by police inside the apartments belonging to Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio. It turns out that "cocaine-cocco" was present at the orgy. One can only imagine his level of participation in the party "activities". Apparently the police told him to leave before they started arresting people. Why they didn't arrest him too is its own tale of corruption, I suppose. Vatican sources say that Pope Francis knew of "cocco's" presence at that party. Might that be the reason why the police let him off?
Speaking of the pope, Church Militant has learned that the Vatican is attempting to rig its "investigation" of Archbishop McCarrick. Their aim is to ascribe as much responsibility as possible to the now-deceased Pope John Paul II. Neat, huh? Stick it to someone who can no longer defend themselves. But hey! They've rigged synod reports now, haven't they? They've distorted them to make it appear that the bishops unanimously agree that it's time to go soft on perversion, Holy Communion for sodomites and adulterers, etc. After all that, they've no hesitation in putting on a sham investigation to deflect attention from the corruption that still festers inside the Vatican.
Archbishop Mark Coleridge of the Archdiocese of Brisbane (Austrilia) tweeted a few days ago as a reply to Jesus being "consultant or king", that "not too sure that I want or have him as either". It sure sounds like apostasy to me. I found it rather hard to believe, but unless his twitter account was hacked, the evidence is there to see. I found the exchange on twitter and post it below. Click the tweet to see Coleridge's reply.
"Most people want Jesus as a consultant rather than a King” @timkellernyc— Daniel Ang (@DanielAngRC) October 7, 2018
As you can see from the comments, several people have asked him for clarification and have received no response. I myself just posted an email to the diocesan website and encourage all to do the same. If we just reply to the tweet and his account is indeed hacked, he'll never get the message. If, however, I fail to receive any reply to my inquiry, well, that indeed will be a reply.
During a recent interview, Cardinal Cupich said it's "not our policy" to deny Holy Communion to those in sodomite #mowwidge. In other words, it's his policy to thumb his nose at Canon law and the Tradition of the Church. It's also his policy to persecute faithful priests in his diocese, such as Fathers Paul Kalchik and Frank Phillips. Speaking of faithful priests in the Chicago area, Cupich was asked in that same interview about Bishop Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield, a suffragan diocese of the Chicago metropolitan. Paprocki made clear that his diocese would obey Canon 915. We can imagine that Cupich is already doing all in his power to make Paprocki's life as miserable as possible.
Please recall that last summer a drug-and-sodomy orgy was busted by police inside the apartments belonging to Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio. It turns out that "cocaine-cocco" was present at the orgy. One can only imagine his level of participation in the party "activities". Apparently the police told him to leave before they started arresting people. Why they didn't arrest him too is its own tale of corruption, I suppose. Vatican sources say that Pope Francis knew of "cocco's" presence at that party. Might that be the reason why the police let him off?
Speaking of the pope, Church Militant has learned that the Vatican is attempting to rig its "investigation" of Archbishop McCarrick. Their aim is to ascribe as much responsibility as possible to the now-deceased Pope John Paul II. Neat, huh? Stick it to someone who can no longer defend themselves. But hey! They've rigged synod reports now, haven't they? They've distorted them to make it appear that the bishops unanimously agree that it's time to go soft on perversion, Holy Communion for sodomites and adulterers, etc. After all that, they've no hesitation in putting on a sham investigation to deflect attention from the corruption that still festers inside the Vatican.
Tuesday, October 9, 2018
Youth Synod's Instrumentum Laboris - A Disaster At First Glance
After last week's extremely inauspicious beginning, we had to expect more mess to come from the "youth synod". Indeed it has. We can see it in the Instrumentum Laboris. I won't have time this evening to do an exhaustive study, but will point out some glaring departures from the Faith, ones that can only be overlooked by the obstinately blind.
The first few sections list all manners of "concerns" facing young people, whether imaginary or fancied. However, all these concerns were those of this life. Nowhere was there mention of mankind's ultimate destiny. Nowhere was there mention of God's purpose for our lives. While they ostensibly are kvetching about the need to reach young people and how the Church can be relevant, the bishops refuse to acknowledge Jesus Christ's reason for establishing the Church: to save souls. That is the ultimate concern and goal of everyone - young and old. The Church's primary and overarching mission is to guide people to heaven.
As I read this document, it seems that whoever wrote it is hell-bent on doing the precise opposite.
Look at section 16 under "life choices". I'll quote: "Crucial moments for the development of our identity include: deciding our course of study, choosing our profession, deciding our beliefs, discovering our sexuality and making life-changing commitments."
Do we have here an attempt to insinuate acceptance of the gay lifestyle? "Discovering sexuality" is not a choice as is "profession" and "course of studies". One is born male or female. One acknowledges that, or one sins against truth. With that, there is no choice among several morally acceptable options, as with the others. Whoever allowed that to be published deserves many rebukes - even if he sits on Peter's chair.
I will examine this thing more closely soon. Meanwhile, here's an analysis from Crisis. Suffice it to say that if this is a harbinger of the guidance that our young people can expect, their chances of eternal salvation are greatly imperiled and parents must be extra vigilant.
The first few sections list all manners of "concerns" facing young people, whether imaginary or fancied. However, all these concerns were those of this life. Nowhere was there mention of mankind's ultimate destiny. Nowhere was there mention of God's purpose for our lives. While they ostensibly are kvetching about the need to reach young people and how the Church can be relevant, the bishops refuse to acknowledge Jesus Christ's reason for establishing the Church: to save souls. That is the ultimate concern and goal of everyone - young and old. The Church's primary and overarching mission is to guide people to heaven.
As I read this document, it seems that whoever wrote it is hell-bent on doing the precise opposite.
Look at section 16 under "life choices". I'll quote: "Crucial moments for the development of our identity include: deciding our course of study, choosing our profession, deciding our beliefs, discovering our sexuality and making life-changing commitments."
Do we have here an attempt to insinuate acceptance of the gay lifestyle? "Discovering sexuality" is not a choice as is "profession" and "course of studies". One is born male or female. One acknowledges that, or one sins against truth. With that, there is no choice among several morally acceptable options, as with the others. Whoever allowed that to be published deserves many rebukes - even if he sits on Peter's chair.
I will examine this thing more closely soon. Meanwhile, here's an analysis from Crisis. Suffice it to say that if this is a harbinger of the guidance that our young people can expect, their chances of eternal salvation are greatly imperiled and parents must be extra vigilant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
